Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Kalaga Satyavathi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to implement prior orders. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. agreement terms and compliance. (Para 5 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. transfer of property per court directive. (Para 6 , 11) |
| 4. concealment of facts affects case legitimacy. (Para 12 , 16) |
| 5. doctrine of ‘clean hands' applied. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed with costs. (Para 17) |
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri G.Ramagopal, learned counsel for the 7th respondent, and Ms.Iswarya, learned junior standing counsel for respondents 2 to 6.
2. The above writ petition has been filed to declare the action of respondents 2 to 6 in neither implementing the order in C.G.No.138 of 2023 on the file of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, APEPDCL, Visakhapatnam, nor terminating of the power supply to service connection bearing SC No.1113300509000567, as illegal and arbitrary.
3. The affidavit was deposed by the son as the General Power of Attorney holder. In the affidavit, it was contended that the deponent‟s mother gave a complaint to the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (For short “CGRF”), APEPDCL, Visakhapatnam, for disconnection of the power supply to the service connectio
A litigant must disclose all material facts truthfully; failure to do so results in dismissal of the claim for abusing the court's process.
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
It is bounden duty of court to uphold truth and do justice.
Point of Law : Making a false statement on oath is an offence punishable under Section 181 of the IPC while furnishing false information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to....
Suppression of material facts disentitles a party to invoke equitable jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Concealment of material facts in legal proceedings undermines judicial integrity, leading to dismissal of petitions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
