Back
RAJESH BINDAL, JASPREET SINGH
People Action Justice For All Foundation through Vice President – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
RAJESH BINDAL, CJ.
1. The present writ petition has been filed alleging that the respondent no.7 has raised illegal construction by encroaching the Government land and the same be directed to be removed.
2. Learned counsel for the official respondents submitted that the present writ petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground of concealment of material facts.
3. The petitioner had earlier filed a Writ Petition bearing Misc. Bench No. 21352 of 2019 through its Secretary raising the issue that respondents no. 7 therein has been wrongly granted recognition 2 P.I.L. CIVIL No. - 26081 of 2020
for running the school by producing documents showing it to be the owner of the land, though it was not the owner, however, the aforesaid writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedy available for the aforesaid purpose in law.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that the present writ petition has been filed through Vice President concealing the factum of filing the earlier petition, though, the property in question and the school are same.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought to explain the position stating that issues sough
Point of Law : Making a false statement on oath is an offence punishable under Section 181 of the IPC while furnishing false information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to....
A litigant who approaches the court with unclean hands, by concealing material facts, is not entitled to any relief.
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
Point of Law : Appellants do no deserve any relief from this Court, as they are not only guilty of concealment of material facts from Court but had also indulged in forum shopping. They made efforts ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-mentioning of details with regard to previous petitions and the order disposing of the said petitions was not deliberate material conc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
