SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 906

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, C.J., Ravi Cheemalapati, J.
The Krishna District Cooperative Central Bank Limited and others - Appellants
Versus
Dasari Venkata Srinivasa Rao and others - Respondents
Writ Appeal No : 693 of 2024
Decided On : 20-05-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. P. Veera Reddy, Ld. Senior Counsel appearing vice Mr. S.Dilip Jaya Ram
For the Respondent: Mr. Ghanta Prasad, GP

Cooperative banks are categorized under the Banking Regulations Act, 1949, thereby requiring debt recovery through federal legislation and not state mechanisms.

Headnote:(A) Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 - Section 70 - Debt Recovery Tribunals Act, 1993 - Jurisdiction of Registrar of Cooperative Societies regarding recovery of debts challenged - Court held that powers under the Act of 1964 could not be invoked for such recoveries; reliance on the Constitution Bench judgment in Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule s case. (Paras 2, 8, 23)

(B) Cooperative banks - Legal status as banking institutions - The court reiterated that cooperative banks fall under the Banking Regulations Act, 1949, thereby excluding them from the jurisdiction of the Registrar for recovery of debts, as such matters fall under the legislative domain of the Union. (Paras 20, 24)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner availed a loan of Rs.25 Lakhs from the appellant Cooperative Society, defaulted on payment, and the Society sought recovery via the Registrar under the Act of 1964, which was contested by the petitioner on jurisdictional grounds. (Paras 4-5)

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed that recovery proceedings for debts owed by members of a cooperative bank must proceed through the Debt Recovery Tribunal as per the legislative framework established under the RDB Act of 1993. (Paras 10-11)

Issues: The primary issues included whether cooperative banks could invoke state jurisdiction for debt recovery against members and if such matters should fall under the Debt Recovery Tribunal as stipulated by the central legislation. (Paras 22, 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored that legislative competence for the recovery of debt by cooperative banks rests with the Parliament. Cooperative banks, although regulated by the State for operational aspects, must resort to federal jurisdiction for recovery procedures under the RDB Act, highlighting the exclusive nature of banking regulation at the Union level. (Paras 23-24)

Result: Writ appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.

The present Writ Appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 09.07.2024 passed in writ petition No.5957 of 2024.

2. The learned single Judge has allowed the writ petition and held that the Registrar of Cooperative Societies had no jurisdiction to invoke its powers under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as, "the Act of 1964") for recovery of debt due from the petitioner – respondent No.1 herein and that respondent No.5 in the writ petition that is the Krishna District Cooperative Central Bank Limited would have to resort to the procedure as prescribed under the Debt Recovery Tribunals Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1993"). For arriving at the aforementioned conclusion, reliance was placed by the learned single Judge on a Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court, in the case of Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule vs. Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Limited , [ (2020) 9 SCC 215 ]

3. With a view to understand the issue in the backdrop of which the present controversy has risen, it is necessary to briefly state the material facts:

4. The petitioner, Dasari Venkata Srinivasa Rao, respondent No.1 herein availed a loan of Rs.25 Lakhs from the appellant Bank in the year 2019. Having committed a default in the payment of the instalments fixed, proceedings were initiated by the appellant Bank in terms of the provisions of the Act of 1964. Needless to say that the appellant is a Cooperative Society registered under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and is engaged in the business of banking. The banking business of the appellant - society is limited to its Members who may be advanced loans on such terms as are prescribed under law. The disputes between the Society and its Members in regard to any claim or debt, is governed by Chapter VIII and in particular Section 61, which envisages such a dispute to be referred to the Registrar for decision.

5. Chapter X of the Act of 1964 deals with execution of Decisions, Decrees and Orders passed by the authorities mentioned under the said Chapter. While sub-section (1) of Section 70 envisages the power of the Registrar or any person authorised by him to order a recovery of amounts as envisaged in the contingency in sub-clauses (a) to (f) of Section 70 (1), sub-section (2) of Section 70 envisages the mode and method of execution of the Decisions made under Sections 60, 71, 76, 77 and 78 through either a Civil Court having local jurisdiction on a certificate signed by the Registrar or any person authorised by him as if the order or decision were a decree of that Court, or by the Collector on an application made to him within prescribed time.

Sub-clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 70 also envisages recovery by the Registrar in the manner provided under sub-section (1). Further, Section 70(1) falling under Chapter X envisages as under:

"70. Power of the Registrar to recover certain amount by attachment and sale of property and execution of orders:

(1) The Registrar or any person authorised by him in this behalf may, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery provided by or under this Act, recover—

(a) any amount due under a decision or an order of the Registrar, or any person authorised by him, or an arbitrator;

(b) any amount ordered to be paid towards the expenses of a general meeting of a society called under Section 32;

(c) any amount awarded by way of costs under Section 56 to a society including a financing bank or a Federal society;

(d) any amount payable 1 [xxx] towards fees under Section 58;

(e) any amount ordered under Section 60 to be repaid to a society or recovered as a contribution to its assets ; or (f) any amount ordered under Section 66 to be recovered as a contribution to its assets, together with the interest, if any, due on such amount and the costs of process by the attachment and sale or by sale without attachment of the property of the person or the soci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top