Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Daggubati Yeeswara Krishna Mohan – Appellant
Versus
M. V. Satyanarayana Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal standing of parties in litigation (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the will and application for transposition (Para 4 , 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's endorsement of transposition as justified (Para 6 , 10 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 38) |
| 4. clarification of procedural provisions under cpc (Para 18 , 20 , 24 , 36) |
| 5. dismissal of the petition and urgency for trial completion (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.
Heard Sri M. R. S. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ch. Markondaiah, learned counsel for the respondents, and perused the material on record.
2. This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the 1st defendant in O.S.No.104 of 1995 (in short ‘suit’) pending in the Court of the V Additional Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division), Vijayawada (in short ‘learned Court’). Muggula Ganga Ratnam, the mother of the present respondents No.1 to 6, filed O.S.No.104 of 1995 against Dhaggupati Yeeswara Krishna Mohan, 1st defendant in the suit/present petitioner for possession of the plaint schedule property and for future profits from the date of the suit till the date of delivery of pos
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
