Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Golagani Simhachalam, S/o. Chinnayya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue – Respondent
Order :
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J.
Sri K.Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Withdrawal of a writ petition under Article 226 is permissible, affirming the petitioners' right to discontinue legal action without further judicial orders.
The court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition at the discretion of the petitioner without adverse implications.
Permission to withdraw a Writ Petition allows for filing a fresh petition under the same pleadings.
The permissibility of withdrawing a writ petition was affirmed by the court, resulting in a dismissal of the case as withdrawn.
The withdrawal of a writ petition is acknowledged where no compelling reasons to refuse exist.
A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition, and such withdrawal leads to dismissal without costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
