Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
BATTU DEVANAND, A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, JJ.
B. Somasekhar Naik, S/o. B. Ramachandrudu – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Appeal No. 1043 of 2025
Decided On : 27-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeal filed against previous order. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel claims no request made for adjournment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court advises counsel to submit before judge. (Para 4) |
| 4. no costs ordered, pending matters closed. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
Battu Devanand, J.
This Writ Appeal is filed against the order, dated 01.09.2025 in W.P.No.30928 of 2023 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court wherein considering the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, directed to be posted the writ petition along with W.P.Nos.30879 and 30917 of 2022 after obtaining permission from the Hon’ble the Chief Justice. Aggrieved by the said order, the present writ appeal is filed.
2. Sri G. Siva Prasad Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, would submit that he never requested the learned single Judge to post W.P.No.30928 of 2023 along with connected W.P.Nos.30879 and 30917 of 2022. But, the learned single Judge erroneously directed the Registry to post W.P.No.30928 of 2023 along with connected W.P.Nos.30879 and 30917 of 2022 after obtaining permission from the Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
3. During the course of hearing of this writ appeal today, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that already after obtaining permission from the Hon’ble the Chief Justice, W.P.No.30928 of 2023 is listed before the concerned learned single Judge having roster along with connected matters, but it could not reached.
4. In the aforesaid circumstances, in our view, it is appropriate to dispose of this writ appeal with advice to the learned counsel for the appellant to make all submissions before the learned single Judge. The learned counsel for the appellant is at liberty to make his request before the concerned Bench having roster to take up writ petition for early hearing.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
The court emphasized proper procedural conduct in managing writ petitions, allowing parties to address their concerns directly with the original bench.
The principle of res judicata applies, barring subsequent similar writ petitions when a prior similar order has become final.
The court established that strict adherence to the roster system for case management is essential to ensure judicial efficiency and prevent confusion in the handling of related cases.
Accuracy of court records
Writ appeal closed after confirming compliance with single judge order by both parties.
The importance of accurate and careful handling of court orders and documents to avoid confusion and ensure the proper disposition of cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
