SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1272

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J.
Shaik Mahaboob Peera S/o Meera Saheb – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent 
Writ Petition Nos. 28742, 30117 of 2024, Writ Petition Nos. 14152, 17283, 20701 of 2025
Decided On : 04-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Raja Reddy Koneti
For the Respondent: Devi Subhashini Anne

Eviction orders relating to Inam lands must comply with prescribed procedures, specifically that only the RDO can conduct inquiries and issue eviction orders, as stated in the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987.

Headnote:(A) Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Section 83(2) and Section 77 - Challenge to eviction orders - The petitions contend that the impugned orders are illegal as only the RDO is competent to conduct an inquiry regarding eviction of unauthorized occupants of Inam lands. (Paras 3, 4)

(B) Precedent - Issues in the current petitions are covered by earlier judgment in W.P.Nos.15005 & 15006 of 2025, dated 21.08.2025. (Paras 5)

(C) Judicial Efficiency - The court exercises discretion to dispose of similar matters collectively to maintain consistency in judicial orders. (Paras 2, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenge the eviction orders issued by the 4th respondent. They argue these orders are unsustainable under the Act as the relevant procedure concerning Inam lands was not followed.

Findings of Court:
The court disposed of the petitions in line with its earlier judgment in similar matters, maintaining judicial consistency.

Issues: The principal issue was whether eviction orders issued by the 4th respondent were sustainable given the provisions governing Inam lands under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that eviction procedures under the Act must be adhered to, particularly that the RDO must conduct inquiries into unauthorized occupations, reinforcing legal protocols for such land disputes.

Result: Writ Petitions disposed of; no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and authority in eviction orders. (Para 1 , 2)
2. requirements for eviction of unauthorized occupants. (Para 3 , 4)
3. consistency with previous court orders. (Para 5)
4. outcome based on prior case precedent. (Para 6)
5. closure of all pending applications. (Para 7)

ORDER :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments and the learned Standing Counsel for Endowments appearing for the respondents.

2. Since the issues involved in the above Writ Petitions are one and the same, it is appropriate to dispose of the cases by way of a ‘Common Order’.

3. These Writ Petitions are filed challenging the impugned orders of the 4th respondent passed under Section 83 (2) of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (in short herein after referred as ‘the Act’).

4. It is contended that the subject lands are Inam lands. Under the provisions of Section 77 of the Act, in case of Inam lands, it is the RDO, who has to conduct enquiry and pass orders for eviction of the unauthorized occupants, and resume the land. Thus, it is contended that in the light of the said provisions, the notice issued under Section 83 of the Act is not sustainable.

5. Both the learned counsel submit that the issue involved in all the cases is covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.15005 & 15006 of 2025, dated 21.08.2025, thus prays for passing of the same order in the present case(s).

6. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, in terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.15005 & 15006 of 2025, dated 21.08.2025. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Registry is directed to append a copy of the order in W.P.Nos.15005 & 15006 of 2025, dated 21.08.2025 to this order.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top