Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y.LAKSHMANARAO
Pathapati Peera Reddy – Appellant
Versus
tate of AP Rep by Its PP Hyd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 29/2016
The Criminal Revision Case has been preferred by the de-facto complainant under Section 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [the Cr.P.C] challenging the order of discharge of the Respondent Nos.2 to 4, vide order dated 26.08.2015, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 423 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, [theI.P.C ]passed by the learned V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore, 3 the Trial Court
A. FACTUAL MATRIX
CONTENTIONS OF THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 IN THE DISCHARGE PETITION:
2. For better and effective understating of the gamut of the dispute, it is apposite to summarize at first the contentions of the Accused and Respondent Nos.2 to 4 under this factual matrix head. The Station House Officer, V Town Police Station, Nellore [the Investigating Officer], filed a charge sheet under Section 173 of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’ against the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 423 and 468 of ‘the I.P.C.,’ in Crime No.222 of 2005, which was registered on the basis of the report lodged by Pathapati Pera Reddy/de-facto complainant, wherein it was alleged that
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to carefully consider the allegations of cheating and fraud, particularly in cases involving multiple parties and complex transactions. Th....
The concealment of prior ownership during a property sale constitutes prima facie evidence of cheating, while insufficient evidence exists for forgery charges.
Execution of sale deeds exceeding a co-sharer’s share does not constitute forgery or cheating, reaffirming that civil disputes should not be criminalized without clear offences being present.
The execution of sale deeds by co-sharers exceeding their portion does not constitute forgery or criminal liability, reaffirming that such disputes are civil in nature.
There must be a prima facie case for a cognizance order; if facts only reveal a civil dispute, the criminal proceedings cannot proceed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
