Back
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Vishwanath @ Vishu Phaniraj Gopi Bhat – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Through Gokarna Police Station, Rep. by SPP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basic facts of the case and complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments regarding discharge application. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments around defamation complaint. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. role of prior sanction in prosecution. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. concerns over government influence on prosecution. (Para 15) |
| 6. court's observations on sanction requirements. (Para 17) |
| 7. issues around the public prosecutor's role. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. investigation stage does not require sanction. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 9. cognizance and requirement of sanction. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. implications of filing a charge sheet. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 11. validity of withdrawal of sanction. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 12. limitations on government's role in prosecution. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 13. defamation complaints and aggrieved parties. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 14. applicability of section 153-a ipc. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 15. interpretation of section 67 of it act. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 16. public interest considerations in withdrawals. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 17. final conclusion and directive. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for quashing of the order dated 28.11.2014 passed by the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, K
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
