[Followed / Affirmed Treatment]

<00100021467>: The case discusses the Supreme Court's inherent jurisdiction to correct errors in subsequent proceedings, implying a reaffirmation of its authority rather than a negative treatment.

<00100007816>: Clarifies the concept of "per incuriam" in legal decisions, which is a standard legal principle, suggesting acceptance rather than criticism.

<00100049483>: States that the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, is a self-contained code, reflecting an authoritative stance.

<00100026902>: Emphasizes the importance of considering larger public interest in administrative review under Article 226, indicating a guiding principle rather than a negative treatment.

<00300009319>: Affirms the binding nature of the Full Bench decision in Excellent Education Society's case, indicating respect for precedent.

<00100034626>: Discusses the need for a committee in policy implementation, which appears to be a procedural guideline rather than a treatment of law.

<00100041177>: Reinforces the importance of strict compliance with statutory mandates, a standard judicial principle.

<00500004024>: Recognizes the necessity of detention orders even when the petitioner is in custody, affirming the law's application.

<00100053738>: States that statutes requiring specific procedures must be followed strictly, a standard principle.

<00100064026>: Explains solatium as part of compensation, reflecting accepted legal principles.

<00100066452>: Affirms that the State must pay compensation when acquiring private property, consistent with constitutional protections.

[Distinguished / Clarified Treatment]

<00100064026>: Clarifies that compensation without solatium and interest is not unconstitutional, thereby distinguishing particular statutory provisions.

<00100063940>: Clarifies the precedence of NHAI Act over Arbitration and Conciliation Act in land acquisition, establishing specific statutory interpretation.

<00100007842>: Clarifies that absence of solatium and interest provisions does not violate Article 14, clarifying constitutional applicability.

<00100005339>: Clarifies that election petitions in Hindi are valid and defects in verification are curable, reinforcing procedural clarity.

<00100063733>: Clarifies that contractual jurisdiction clauses do not oust jurisdiction of courts, emphasizing legal interpretation.

<00100046611>: Clarifies that courts have jurisdiction in cases based on constitutional or natural justice principles, affirming judicial authority.

<00100001846>: Clarifies the inviolability of constitutional jurisdiction of High Courts and Supreme Court, emphasizing constitutional hierarchy.

<00500009689>: Explains the procedure for recording information under TADA, clarifying procedural requirements.

<00100049483>: States that Town Planning Act is a self-contained code, clarifying statutory scope.

[Other Treatment Patterns]

<00100042099>: The case deals with personal obligations and property rights, with no indication of subsequent treatment or judicial treatment pattern.

<00100007407>: Clarifies that a draft plan does not impose an embargo under a specific section, with no indication of subsequent treatment.

<00100053738>: Emphasizes procedural compliance, with no subsequent treatment indicated.

<00100049483>: Reiterates statutory scope, with no evidence of subsequent treatment.

<00100066452>: Restates principles of compensation, no indication of being overruled or criticized.

<00100026902>: Discusses judicial discretion in administrative review, no subsequent treatment indicated.

<00100034626>: Addresses policy implementation, no subsequent treatment indicated.

<00100041177>: Emphasizes statutory compliance, no subsequent treatment.

<00500004024>: Discusses detention necessity, no subsequent treatment.

<00100053738>: Reinforces procedural adherence, no subsequent treatment.

<00100064026>: Explains solatium, no subsequent treatment.

<00100066452>: Reiterates compensation principles, no subsequent treatment.

<00100007842>: States absence of solatium and interest is not unconstitutional, no indication of overrule.

<00100063940>: Clarifies statutory hierarchy, no subsequent treatment.

<00100026902>: Highlights judicial discretion in public interest, no subsequent treatment.

<00300009319>: Affirms the binding nature of a decision, indicating respect for precedent.

<00100034626>: Discusses policy and administrative matters, no treatment pattern.

<00100041177>: Reiterates statutory compliance, no subsequent treatment.

<00500009689>: Clarifies procedural requirements, no subsequent treatment.

<00100049483>: States Town Planning Act as a self-contained code, no subsequent treatment.