SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 89

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K. Natarajan, J.
A G Prasad & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Karnataka & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Petition No. 1366 of 2022
Decided On : 12-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Jagadeesh H T, Advocate, B.J. Rohith, Advocate, Prakasha V, Advocate

The court has discretion to allow a petitioner to withdraw their petition.

Headnote:- Withdrawal of Petition - N/A

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's counsel filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by the court.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. ISSUES None specified in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi:

The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition based on the petitioner's request. FINAL DECISION The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

K.Natarajan, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo, seeking permission of this court to withdraw the petition.

2. The said memo is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top