SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.G. Uma, J.
Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 9735 of 2022
Decided On : 27-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Nagamani V, Advocate, H.S. Shankar, Advocate

A petitioner has the right to withdraw their petition, leading to its dismissal without further proceedings.

Headnote:

WITHDRAWAL - PETITION - The court acknowledged the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition, leading to the dismissal of the case as withdrawn.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court accepted the memo and placed it on record, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.

Issues: Whether the petitioner could withdraw the petition and what the implications of such withdrawal would be.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the principle that a petitioner has the right to withdraw their petition at any stage before a final decision is made.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

M G Uma, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.

2. Memo is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top