Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.G. Uma, J.
Pavan Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 9716 of 2022
Decided On : 27-01-2023
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, and the memo requesting withdrawal was filed.Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition and dismissed it accordingly. ISSUES None stated in the judgment.Ratio Decidendi:
The court's decision was based on the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition. FINAL DECISION The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.JUDGMENT
M G Uma, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
N/A
N/A
A petitioner has the right to withdraw their petition, leading to its dismissal without further proceedings.
A petitioner retains the absolute right to withdraw a writ petition at any stage, and upon formal submission, the court should allow such withdrawal.
The court upheld the petitioner's right to unilaterally withdraw the original petition without opposition.
The court has discretion to allow a petitioner to withdraw their petition.
Discretionary power of the court in allowing withdrawal of petitions and granting liberty for future filings.
The court affirmed the right to withdraw an original petition, leading to its dismissal.
A petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon request by petitioner when court grants such permission.
Courts may accept withdrawal of writ petitions upon filing of memo when no third-party rights are affected.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
