Back
SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
M. Shriram – Appellant
Versus
Gagandeep Singh Bedi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents herein for the deliberate violation of the orders of the Court in W.A. No. 2863 of 2023 in order, dated 17.10.2023 as per the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act.
1. This Contempt Petition has been filed complaining willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.A. No. 2863 of 2023, dated 17.10.2023.
2. According to the petitioner, by erroneous and illegal departure from the rules laid down in the prospectus in respect of the admission to the Post-Graduate Medical Courses in the State of Tamil Nadu for the Academic Year 2023-2024, the candidates who had already choice locked their seats in Round-I, Round-II and Round-III under the All India Quota were permitted to take part in Round-III for the seats which fell under the State Quota. Therefore, the Writ Petition in W.P. No. 29086 of 2023 was filed by him.
3. The prayer in the said Writ Petition was to call for the records on the file of the third respondent namely, the Secretary, Selection Committee in respect of the notification, dated 27.09.2023 and the consequential re-allo
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of preserving merit in the admission process for Post-Graduate Medical Courses, despite deviations from the admission rules and the ....
The admissions of the petitioners were declared unsustainable and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. They were directed to participate in the special stray vacancy round of coun....
The court upheld the principle of merit-cum-choice in admissions, confirming that procedural fairness is essential when rectifying errors in provisional seat allotment results.
Fairness and transparency in medical seat allotment must prevail, prohibiting exclusion of meritorious candidates from the selection process.
Court upheld the interpretation of admission guidelines, confirming eligibility of candidates who participated in earlier rounds for subsequent rounds in the counselling process.
No legal right vested in the petitioner for allocation of vacant seat, as admission processes are bound by established counseling protocols, reflecting the principle of no fault leading to no prejudi....
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Hon’ble Supreme Court judgments to determine the correct categorization of candidates in UG Counselling for MBBS / BDS seats....
Candidates selected under the SC category, if eligible for the UR category, should be considered only under the UR category.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
