SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2079

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
B.M.SHYAM PRASAD, M.I.ARUN, T.M.NADAF, JJ.
 
Miss Chandana M. Chavan, D/o. Maruti – Appellant 
Versus 
The State Of Karnataka, Higher Education Department, Represented By Its Principal Secretary To Government – Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 31934 Of 2025 (EDN-RES) C/W, Writ Petition No. 32428 Of 2025 (EDN-RES), WRIT Petition No. 32391 Of 2025 (EDN-RES), Writ Petition No. 32510 Of 2025 (EDN-RES), Writ Petition No. 32519 Of 2025 (EDN-MED ADM)
Decided On : 05-12-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri.Vivek Holla, Adv. A/W, Ms. Maya Holla., Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri. M.N. Sudev Hegde, Aga., Sri. N. K. Ramesh, Adv., Sri. H.R. Showri, Adv.

Fairness and transparency in medical seat allotment must prevail, prohibiting exclusion of meritorious candidates from the selection process.

Headnote:(A) National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2023 - Section 14 - NEET (UG) - Seat allotment procedure - Petitioners excluded from participating in the third selection round for additional seats despite successfully qualifying in previous rounds - Court ruled that the KEA’s exclusion of petitioners is arbitrary and not in line with Apex Court guidelines ensuring fairness and transparency in seat allotment processes. (Paras 8, 15.8)

(B) Fairness in seat allocation - The principle of merit must dictate seat allotment in education; all candidates must have equal opportunity to participate in selection rounds based on their merits without unjust exclusions. (Paras 15.8 and 16.6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners qualified NEET (UG) 2025 and participated in seat allotments but were excluded from the third selection round by KEA, which allowed new entrants. They contested this exclusion based on claims of arbitrariness and lack of transparency in the process initiated post-allotment.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the KEA's procedures failed to adhere to statutory requirements and judicial directives regarding the equitable treatment of candidates based on merit, resulting in an arbitrary exclusion of petitioners.

Issues: The primary questions were whether the KEA acted arbitrarily by excluding the petitioners from the third selection round and if the new entrants should be allowed to participate against merit-based seat allocation principles.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that exclusion from the selection process based on arbitrary criteria undermines the fundamental principles of fairness. The KEA must ensure all eligible candidates, especially those demonstrating merit in previous rounds, be allowed the same opportunities without favoritism towards less meritorious candidates.

Result: The provisional seat allotment list dated 24.10.2025 was quashed, and KEA directed to redo the seating allotment process adhering to fairness principles.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek participation in lawfully mandated counselling. (Para 1 , 2)
2. regulatory framework for neet (ug) seat allotment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. procedural validity of the kea's actions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. allegations of arbitrariness in kea's procedures. (Para 11 , 12)
5. analysis of kea's compliance with statutory mandates. (Para 13 , 14)
6. need for fair and equitable allotment processes. (Para 15)
7. conclusions directing the kea to revise and complete the third selection round. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT :

B. M. SHYAM PRASAD, J.

1.The petitioners have successfully participated in the qualifying examinations of the Undergraduate - National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test -2025 [NEET (UG)] for admission to the MBBS course in both Government and Private Medical Colleges, and they have secured seats for MBBS course either in the first or the second selection round seat allotment conducted by the Karnataka Examination Authority [KEA]. The petitioners have preferred these petitions for directions to the Directorate of Medical Education [the State Government/ National Medical Council/ KEA to permit them to participate in 'the third selection round' for admission to all the "vacant seats" while impugning 'the Provisional List of the first stage of the third selection round of Seat Allotment dated 24.10.2025' [the impugned List] contending that the KEA could not have excluded them from this List.

2. These writ petitions are listed before a Division Bench, and the members of the Division Bench have come to different conclusions in their respective orders dated 19.11.2025. The decision per Justice Jayant Banerji [the first decision] is to set aside the impugned List with directions to the KEA to:

[i] undertake the process of the third selection round of counselling afresh in two stages strictly as per the Apex Court's directions in the State of UP and another v. Bhavna Tiwari and others 2025 SCC Online SC 1357, and

[ii] endeavour to declare the Final List of Allotment before 02.12.2025.

The decision per Justice K.V. Aravind [the second decision] is to dismiss the petitions directing the KEA:

[i] to complete the third selection round expeditiously, and

[ii] to complete the counselling process of all permissible rounds by 10.12.2025.

After this verdict, this Bench is constituted. This Court opines that the relevant facts must be recorded before the reasons in the two decisions are stated concisely followed by the rival submissions, the questions for consideration and this Court's conclusions.

3. A Brief of the Background facts:

3.1 The National Medical Commission [NMC] has notified, on 02.06.2023, Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2023 [GMER-23] for the conduct of National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test [NEET (UG)] as contemplated under Section 14 of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019. The NMC, under Regulation 7, Chapter III of GMER-23, may designate any agency or authority to conduct the NEET (UG) and for Common Counselling under the guidelines published by it. The Designated Authority for the States, such as the KEA [for Karnataka] who conduct Common Counselling, must submit the Final List of students in the prescribed proforma to the Under Graduate Medical Education Board [UGMEB] within a week of the completion of the Common Counselling. This is a précis of the relevant Statute and Regulations as an introduction and this Court must next record the Bulletins published by the KEA.

3.2 The First Bulletin [E-Information Bulletin-2025]: The KEA, on 22.01.2025, has published common E-Information Bulletin-2025 for the Common Entrance Test for Engineering and different courses and for Common Counselling for Medical/Dental/AYUSH Courses with instructions. This Bulletin contains guidelines for [i] the filing of online applications, [ii] verification of original documents and [iii] the CET Examination. This Bulletin also contains a Note on Seat Cancellation, Refund and Forfeiture of Fee. The KEA has informed the candidates that if

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top