IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
All India Hdpe/Pp Woven Fabric Manufacturers’ Association – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Government Of India Competition Commission Of India – Respondent
Writ Petition No.287 of 2024 (GM – RES)
Decided on : 08-01-2024
Notification - Quality Control on Import of Plastic - Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 - [Polyethylene Material for Moulding and Extrusion (Quality Control) Order, 2021, Polyethylene Material for Moulding and Extrusion (Quality Control) Order, 2022, Polyethylene Material for Moulding and Extrusion (Quality Control) Order, 2023] - The court discussed the imposition of quality control on import of plastic under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 and rejected the petition, emphasizing the importance of quality control in plastic manufacturing for public health and safety standards.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Association of Manufacturers and suppliers of plastic products, challenged a Notification issued by the Government of India imposing quality control on import of plastic into the nation. The petitioner claimed that the quality control order would restrict free movement and sale of raw materials and create a monopoly in the industry.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the petition, emphasizing the importance of quality control in plastic manufacturing for public health and safety standards. It held that the quality control orders were necessary to ensure the final plastic products meet certain standards of quality and would not become hazardous to the environment.
Issues: The issues involved the imposition of quality control on import of plastic, the alleged monopoly in the industry, and the impact on the petitioner's business.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the quality control orders were necessary to ensure the final plastic products meet certain standards of quality and would not become hazardous to the environment. It emphasized the importance of quality control in plastic manufacturing for public health and safety standards.
Final Decision: The court rejected the petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's claims.
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question a Notification dated 15-04-2021 issued by Government of India which imposes quality control on import of plastic into the shores of the nation to become effective from 05-01-2024.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts in brief, are as follows:-
The petitioner is said to be an Association of Manufacturers and suppliers of high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene and other allied products. It is the case of the petitioner/Association that high density polyethylene is a plastic polymer which is commonly used by variety of consumers including industrial units. It is more resistant to cracking and less likely to suffer from stress induced failure. The low density polyethylene is widely used in packaging like foils, trays and plastic bags for both food and nonfood purposes. The petitioner and its members were importing raw material required for manufacture and supply of high density polyethylene and low density polyethylene products and after such import were supplying finished goods all over the country not restricted to domestic consumption but were also exporting and claims to be contributing to the economy of the country. It is the averment that the industries coming under the Association are feeding over 25 lakh families as they have employed that many persons in their respective industries.
3. The third respondent/Department of Chemicals and Petro Chemicals of the Union of India issues a quality control order on 15-04-2021 seeking to impose certain restrictions on low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene and high density polyethylene. The quality control was that the aforesaid polyethylenes should confirm to the corresponding Indian standard and shall bear the standard mark under a licence from the Bureau of Indian Standards (‘BIS’ for short) as per Schedule I and Schedule-II of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018. The petitioner claims that imposition of such a clause on the supply of raw material will restrict free movement and sale of the said raw materials and would create a monopoly in the hands of a few in the industry. It is, therefore, the Association submitted certain representations to respondents 2 and 3 to have a look at the conditions imposed in the quality control order insofar as it necessitates the quality to pass through the BIS with the seal of BIS. That is not acceded to. On 26-09-2023 the 3rd respondent issues another notification directing that the earlier notification which imposed quality standard would be coming into effect on 05-01-2024. It is, therefore, the petitioner claiming to be aggrieved by the imposition of conditions for import of plastic is before this Court in the subject petition.
4. Heard Sri N.Raghavendra Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri H. Shanthi Bhushan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for the respondents.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would vehemently contend that the notification is aimed at one single purpose, to help Reliance Industries, as according to the petitioner Reliance Industries has a monopoly in the manufacture of linear and a particular ingredient ‘granule’ that is necessary for production of plastic. It is his contention that there is no other player in the market and all the plastic manufacturers have to line up to Reliance Industries only. The learned counsel would further contend that there is no nexus with the production of plastic, for imposition of the aforesaid conditions, he would contend such conditions are imposed on raw material. But, such conditions ought to have been imposed on a finished product and not on raw material. It is his submission that if on finished product quali
Akhil Bharat Goseva Sangh (3) v. State of A.P.
BALCO Employees' Union v. Union of India
Directorate of Film Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain, (2007) 4 SCC 737
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
Natural Resources Allocation, In re, Special Reference No. 1 of 2012, (2012) 10 SCC 1
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, (2000) 10 SCC 664
R.K. Garg v. Union of India, (1981) 4 SCC 675
Ram Singh Vijay Pal Singh v. State of U.P.
RAJEEV SURI v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Shimnit Utsch India (P) Ltd. v. W.B. Transport Infrastructure Development Corpn. Ltd.
State of M.P. v. Narmada Bachao Andolan, (2011) 7 SCC 639
State of Kerala v. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties
State of Orissa v. Gopinath Dash
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of quality control in plastic manufacturing for public health and safety standards.
The impugned notification and orders were issued in public interest to protect the health and safety of children, and the court emphasized the importance of safeguarding the interest and safety of ch....
Therefore, it cannot be said that though the goods were imported during the subsistence of Rules, 2019 cannot be used even after the petitioners are permitted to use in view of the change in policy o....
Fundamental right to clean environment of public at large- a right relatable to fundamental right to life under Article 21 of Constitution.
The requirement of BIS certification for the import of HARC is not mandatory unless the Central Government issues a Gazette notification specifying such requirement.
Important points:Detection of sufficiently large number of cases of fake composite carry bags entering the markets in the State, as would render it practically impossible for the State to prevent tra....
The imposition of penalty for importing timber not meeting Indian fumigation standards was found to be arbitrary and in violation of the petitioners' right to trade, as it conflicted with regulations....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.