JUDGMENT/ORDER

Jyoti Mulimani, J. - Sri.a.Ram Mohan, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri.C.K.Subramanya, learned counsel on behalf of Sri.B.C.Prabhakar for respondent have appeared in person.

2. The material facts of the writ petition can be stated quite shortly as under:

It is stated that the second petitioner was working as a medical representative at Bangalore from 02.05.2005 under the respondent - Company. He joined on June 1995 at Tamil Nadu at Villipuram, transferred to Pondicherry in 2002 and to Bhatinda in 2005. after the union FMRaI's intervention he was transferred to Bangalore. Since he could not afford an independent accommodation, the second petitioner was staying at the guest house of the first petitioner at Bangalore. It is said that the same was not tolerated by the respondent - Company and it started harassing the second petitioner. It is also stated that a charge sheet was issued on 30.05.2007 to the second petitioner which was replied by him vide letter dated:06.06.2007.

The second petitioner was called for inquiry on 25.06.2007. It is averred that the second petitioner was not given an opportunity to defend and the inquiry was completed in one day i.e., on 25.06