SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 562

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
S.Sunil Dutt Yadav, Ramachandra D. Huddar, JJ.
Somaling @ Soma S/o Pandit Shendage - Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.200133 of 2017, Criminal Appeal No.200113 OF 2017
Decided On : 01-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri Shivanand V. Pattanashetti, Advocate, Sri Nandkishore Bood, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri Siddaling P. Patil, Addl. Spp

IMPORTANT POINT
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, emphasizing the quality of evidence over quantity.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 149 - Criminal conspiracy and murder - Accused No.1 and 4 convicted for murder of Amasidda Barakade, sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.30,000 each - Evidence established that accused conspired to kill deceased due to property dispute - Eyewitness accounts corroborated by medical evidence - Conviction upheld. (Paras 11, 12, 39, 46)

(B) Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 134 - Quality of evidence emphasized over quantity - Single reliable witness can suffice for conviction. (Paras 14, 46)

Facts of the case:

Accused No.1 pressured Malappa Barakade to return land purchased from Rudrappa, leading to threats against deceased Amasidda Barakade who supported Malappa. On 19.09.2013, Amasidda was murdered by accused Nos.1 and 4 with the assistance of others. (Paras 1, 2, 39)

Findings of Court:

Prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through eyewitness testimony and medical evidence. (Paras 39, 46)

Issues: Whether the trial Court was justified in convicting the appellants based on the evidence presented. (Paras 10, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the evidence of eyewitnesses, despite being relatives, was credible and corroborated by medical findings, establishing the guilt of the accused. (Paras 39, 46)

Result: Appeals dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.

JUDGMENT :

RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, J.

These two Criminal appeals are arising out of the same occurrence, call in question the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Vijayapura, dated 28.03.2017 in S.C.No.73/2015, wherein accused No.1 has preferred Criminal Appeal No.200113/2017 independently and accused No. 4 has preferred his own independent appeal in Criminal Appeal No.200133/2017 for finding them guilty of committing an offence under Section 302 R/w Section 149 of the IPC and sentencing them to undergo life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.30,000/each for the said offence and in default to pay the fine amount, they were ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 6 months.

FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (FIR)

2. That within the jurisdiction of Kannur village in Sy.No.298 measuring 5 acres of land was purchased by the uncle of accused No.1Kammanna, i.e., Rudrappa, from Malappa Barakade. The accused No.1 was insisting the said Malappa Barakade to get back the said landed property. For that, Malappa was not inclined to return the said land. Therefore, because of this insistence and pressure of accused No.1, Malappa Barakade informed deceased Amasidda Barakade about the pressure of accused No.1. At that time, deceased supported the Malappa Barakade, stating that he would support him and told him not to give back the said properties purchased by him. Therefore, the accused Nos.1 and 2 came to the said deceased Amasidda Barakade 23 times and held out a threat stating that, he has become a hurdle between the purchaser Malappa and themselves and therefore they will not leave him and they were going to kill him. Pursuant to such threat, all the accused in a Samudhaya Bhavan of Maddi Maragamma temple situated near the landed property of accused No.5, the accused No.1 to 4, on 18.09.2013 at 6.00 p.m., by sitting in the said Samudhaya Bhavan along with accused No. 5, have conspired to kill the deceased Amasidda Barakade. Thus, they committed criminal conspiracy in furtherance of the common object to kill Amasidda Barakade. In furtherance of the common object of this conspiracy, it is alleged, that on 19.09.2013 at 5.00 p.m., when deceased Amasidda Barakade was on his landed property, accused Nos.1 and 4, along with accused Nos.2 and 3, by forming themselves into an unlawful assembly having ill-will against the said deceased, came near Amasidda and dragged him towards the other land and at that time, accused Nos. 2, 3, and 4 caught hold of the hands and legs of Amasidda and accused No.1 by using the iron ‘jambe’ assaulted Amasidda on his neck, stomach and caused his murder. With these allegations, a complaint came to be filed by the father of the deceased by name Shankarappa at 00:30 hours on 20.09.2013 before the PSI Vijayapura Rural Police Station, which was registered in Crime No.236/2013 for the offences punishable under Section 302, 504 R/w 34 of the IPC, and the criminal law was set in motion.

INVESTIGATION

3. Consequent upon the registration of the FIR, the CPI Vijayapura Rural Police Station (who was also an investigation officer) proceeded to the place of occurrence along with his police staff and conducted the inquest panchanama in the presence of panchas as per Ex.P13. He noticed the falling of the blood at the scene of offence. During the course of the investigation, accused No.1 to 4 were arrested. Sent the dead body for the postmortem to the Al Ameen Medical College Hospital, Vijayapura. The doctor at Al Ameen Medical College conducted the postmortem on the dead body of Amasidda, aged 32 years, in between 10.30 a.m. and 12.00 noon on 20.09.2013, as per Ex.P34. The investigation officer recorded the statements of the witnesses, sent the seized articles to the FSL for the purpose of chemical examination and on completion of the investigation, the I.O. filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offence under Section 302 R/w Section 149 of the IPC against five accused. Upon c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top