PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ARAVIND KUMAR
Naresh Chandra Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Institute Of Chartered Accountants of India – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
Aravind Kumar, J.
1. The facts in brief are set out herein below:
On 27.09.2009, a series of circuitous transactions (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject transaction’) involving large sums of money are said to have taken place in certain accounts of the branch, which were neither regular nor normal in nature. However, in the audit rep
King Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji MANU/PR/0024/1945 [Para 29] – Relied.
State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. v. P. Krishnamurthy and Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 517 [Para 21] – Relied.
King Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji
Rohtak and Hissar Districts Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
K. Ramanathan v. State of T.N. (1985) 2 SCC 116 [Para 24] – Relied.
D.K. Trivedi and Sons v. State of Gujarat
State of Jammu and Kashmir v Lakhwinder Kumar and Ors.
Academy of Nutrition Improvement v. Union of India (2011) 8 SCC 274 [Para 27] – Relied.
State of Kerala v. Shri M. Appukutty (1963) 14 STC 242 [Para 28] – Relied.
PTC India Ltd. v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (1991) 3 SCC 299 [Para 30] – Relied.
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd. vs Union of India (1990) 3 SCC 223 [Para 30] – Relied.
Afzal Ullah vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 1963 SCC Online SC 76 [Para 31] – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.