Back
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Basaventavva – Appellant
Versus
Irappa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment of the trial court regarding partition. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on validity of previous partition. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. analysis of the 1981 mutation entry. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 18) |
| 4. principles surrounding family settlements. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 20) |
| 5. entitlement of daughters to properties. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. final orders on appeal and partition. (Para 24 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Anant Ramanath Hegde, J. - The defendants No.2 to 6 in O.S.No.124/2010 on the file of III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Hubballi are before this Court under section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure ('Code' for short) challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2013 passed in the above said suit.
2. The suit for partition and separate possession filed by the two daughters of late Chandrappa is decreed in part. Plaintiff No.2 was given 1/5th + 1/25th share and plaintiff No.1 is also held entitled to 1/25th share in Item Nos.1 to 3, 5 and 6 of the suit schedule properties. The plaintiffs have not questioned the said judgment and decree.
3. Genealogy of the parties is as under:
IMAGE
Brief facts:
4.1 One Chandrappa was the propositus. He died on 20.11.1989. His wife Sha
The main legal point established in the judgment is that unless prior partition is established, there shall be a presumption that the property is joint family property, and a family arrangement in th....
The heavy burden of proof upon the proponent of oral partition before it is accepted, as per the settled principle of law by the Apex Court.
Daughters were denied coparcener status under old inheritance laws but still claimed joint family property rights; trial court granted them shares based on family law principles.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the burden of proof lies on the party claiming a prior partition, and in the absence of documentary evidence, unchallenged evidence of the opp....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of daughters to claim partition in coparcenary property under the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as per the l....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
