SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1397

B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
Nuance Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ravi Raghavan
For the Respondent: Amit Anand, K. Hema Kumar, Mallahar Rao

ORDER :

1. These petitions are filed calling in question the orders in appeal under the provisions of Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, the 'CGST Act) as also the rejection of refund applications filed under Section 54 of the CGST Act read with Rule 89 of the CGST Rules. The details of such orders called in question in these petitions are as follows:

Writ Petition No.

Order No.

Date

7826/2022

Order in Appeal No. 221/2021-22/JC-AII/GST

07.02.2022

23144/2021

Refund Rejection Order Nos.06/2021-22(Final)ND-8-GST Refunds and 20/2021-22 (Final)ND-8GST Refunds

25.04.2021 and 20.05.2021

5077/2022

Refund Rejection Order No. Nil/2021-22(Final)ND-8

26.10.2021

2. Sri. Ravi Raghavan, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's claim for refund of Input Tax Credit [ITC] is rejected for the reason that the petitioner has sought such refund under the provisions of Rule 95A and the Circular No. 106/25/2019/GST dated 29.06.2019, and the petitioner's claim for reversal of ITC, an additional question that is canvassed in W.P.No. 23144/2021, is also rejected ove

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top