SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 298

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU 
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.
R.P. Mahesh Kumar S/o R.P. Reddy - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 18794 of 2025
Decided On : 01-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mahammad Asfak
For the Respondents: H.K. Kenche Gowda, Pawan Kumar

The amendments to the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Town Planning acts involving fee levies are unconstitutional and only applicable to larger plots, prohibiting duplicate fees for changes in land use.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 - Sections 18-A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - The provisions under Section 18-A are applicable only to development proposals exceeding 20,000 square meters; previous fee collection for change of land use precludes further fees for subsequent plans - The Court quashed the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Acts of 2021 and 2023 and linked levies to market or guidance value under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 declared illegal. (Paras 3, 4, 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petition challenged the constitutionality of various amendments enacted related to the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and sought relief against certain notices and circulars, citing it was covered by a previous court ruling that set aside those amendments.

Findings of Court:
The petition was allowed; the demand notice was set aside and the BBMP was directed to issue a fresh sanction plan and process the application for the building license as per law.

Issues: The key issue was whether the amendments and notices were lawful in light of previous court rulings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the coordinate bench had definitively ruled on the legal applicability of the amendments, making the current petition redundant and emphasizing the illegal nature of specific fee linkages.

Result: Writ petition allowed; impugned notices quashed.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks to quash legislative acts and notices. (Para 1)
2. court affirms previous judgment on related municipal laws. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. writ petition allowed with directions to bbmp. (Para 7)

ORDER :

1. The captioned petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

WHEREFORE, the petitioner respectfully pray that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to:

(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain other law (amendment) act 2021 act No.1/2022 dated 13/01/2022 enacted by the second respondent published through notification bearing No.DPAL 50 SHASANA 2021 gazette on 13/01/2022 at ANNEXURE-E declaring it to be ultravires and unconstitutional. In so far as petitioner are concerned.

(ii) Issue writ of certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash the office order bearing No. ADTP/PR/461/2021-22 dated 09/03/2022 issued by the third respondent at ANNEXURE-F. In so far as petitioner are concerned.

(iii) Issue a writ of certiorari to quash the demand notice bearing no: BBMP/SUT/TVP/ADTP/0236/25-26 dated 21/06/2025, ANNEXURE-B issued by the respondent No.4 Property bearing 57-32-1334, Sy No. ITI Layout 28th A Main road JP Nagar 1st Phase, Bangalore Ward No:178, South zone, Bangalore in so far as demand notice towards. Fee payable to BBMP and Labour cess.

(iv) Issue writ of Certiorari or similar writ, order or direction to quash the Circular bearing No.He.Ni.Ka.Pa.Ko/P.A/320/2020-21 dated 14/08/2020 at ANNEXURE-G issued by the 3rd Respondent. In so far as petitioner are concerned.

(v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash provisions of section 18-A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning act, 1961 brought into effect by Karnataka act No.23 of 2004 by the respondent No.2 at ANNEXURE-H in so far as 18-A (i)(iv) of Karnataka act No.23 of 2004 is concerned.

In so far as petitioner are concerned.

(vi) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the notification issued by the 1st respondent bearing No.UDD 3TTP 2015 dated 25/2/2020 as contained in ANNEXURE-J in so far as the amended Rule 37-A and rule 37-C are concerned. In so far as petitioner are concerned.

(vii) Issue any other appropriate writ or order or direction to the respondents' demand fit in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.

(vii) Pass any such other orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest justice and equity.

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that across the Bar, the issue is dealt by the Co-ordinate Bench in the reported judgment in W.P. No. 23086/2022 and connected matters. The Co-ordinate Bench, while deciding the issue, has set-aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022) and the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024). Therefore, this Court deems it fit to cull out the operative portion of the order, which reads as under;

"ORDER :

(i) The writ petitions are partly allowed.

(ii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022), is hereby quashed and set aside.

(iii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024), is hereby quashed and set aside.

(iv) It is hereby declared that the provisions contained in Section 18 -A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only in respect of ‘Development Plan’ containing the proposal for construction on plots measuring more than 20,000 square meters in extent and not in respect of plots measuring less than 20,000 square meters.

(v) It is hereby declared that if fee has been earlier collected for change of land

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top