SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 537

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU 
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.
Smt.Narayanamma, W/o Late Sri. N.krishnappa - Appellant 
Versus 
The State Of Karnataka Urban Development Department - Respondent 
WRIT PETITION NO.24727 OF 2022 (LB-BMP) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.15443 OF 2022 (LB-BMP), WRIT PETITION NO.23250 OF 2022 (LB-BMP)
Decided on : 16-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI. VINAY S, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SRI.BOPANNA.B, SRI. V.G.BHANUPRAKASH, ADVOCATE

The court quashed the unconstitutional amendments, declaring prior fees as sufficient for development plans, prohibiting additional charges linked to market value.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 - Section 18-A - Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021, and the subsequent 2023 Act were quashed as ultra vires the Constitution; provisions under Section 18-A were declared applicable only to larger development plans; various demand notices and Circulars were found illegal and set aside. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court ruled that demand notices for fees were issued without jurisdiction and were arbitrary, noting that prior fees collected cannot lead to further charges. (Paras 4-8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to quash multiple demand notices for various fees linked to building permits, arguing their illegality and asserting that new amendments were unconstitutional and violated prior judgment.

Findings of Court:
The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021, and 2023 were set aside; the applicability of certain fees was clarified; demands for additional fees were ruled illegal.

Issues: Whether the amendments are constitutional and to what extent prior fees impact subsequent levies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that earlier fees preclude subsequent demands; the linkage of levies to market value was illegal.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

Table of Content
1. challenges to karnataka municipal corporations act provisions. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court's declarations based on previous ruling. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. writ petitions allowed and notices set aside. (Para 9)

ORDER :

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.

The petitioners in W.P.No.24727/2022 are seeking for the following reliefs.

"i. Issue a writ of certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash the demand notice dated 29/11/2022, bearing No.BBMP/Ad.com/RJH/1629/20-21 issued by Respondent No.4 vide ANNEXURE-A in so far it relates to the demand for payment of Scrutiny fee, License fee, KTCP ACT betterment fee for building, betterment fee for site area, security deposit, lake rejuvenation fee, Administrative charges, ground rent including 18% GST, Road cutting, compound wall fee, water supply scheme, Ring Road, improving the slum, mass rapid transport system, 5% levy and Collection of surcharge payable to BBMP produced at ANNEXURE-A as illegal without jurisdiction and arbitrary.

ii. To grant an order declaring that the entire Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No. 01 of 2022) notified on 13/01/2022 ANNEXURE-V as being ultra vires the constitution of India in so far as petitioners are concerned.

iii. To declare that Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022) notified on13/01/2022 ANNEXURE- V is in violation/contrary to the decision of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.4601/2020 (LB-BMP) which is at Annexure-T.

iv. Grant an order direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the office Order No.Ha. Ni.Na. Yo/PR/461/2021-22 dated:-09/03/2022 issued by Respondent No.3 as contained in ANNEXURE-W in so far the Petitioners are concerned.

v. Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing section 18 A of the Karnataka Town & Country Planning act. 1961 brought into effect by Karnataka Act No.23 of 2004(Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Amendment) act 1998) as contained in ANNEXURE -N insofar as section 18-A(i) and (iv) of the Karnataka Act NO.23 of 2004 is concerned.

vi. Grant an order direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the notification issued by the 1st Respondent bearing No. UDD 3 TTP 2015 Dated 25/2/2020 vide ANNEXURE-M as contained insofar as the RUE 37 A and 37 C is concerned.

vii. Issue writ or order by way of certiorari quashing the circular date:-14/8/2020 bearing No. HE.NI.ΚΑ.ΡΑ.ΚO/PR/320/2020-21 issued by Respondent No.3 ANNEXURE-P in so far as the petitioners are concerned.

viii. Issue writ or order by way of certiorari quashing the Notification issued by Respondent No.1 bearing No. UDD 23 TTP 2020 (E) Dated21/6/2021 as contained in ANNEXURE -Q in so far as the inserted Rule 37 A and37 C is concerned.

ix. Issue writ or order by way of certiorari quashing the Circular date 24/06/2021 bearing No. HE.NI.NA.YO/PR/320/2021-22 issued by Respondent No.3 ANNEXURE-R in so far as the petitioners are concerned.

x. Issue writ or order or direction by way of mandamus directing the Respondent No.3 and 4 BBMP to issue the sanction plan for construction of the residential apartment building in the schedule property without insisting the Scrutiny fee, License fee, KTCP ACT betterment fee for building, betterment fee for site area, security deposit, lake rejuvenation fee, Administrative charges, ground rent including 18% GST, Road cutting, compound wall fee, water supply scheme, Ring Road, improving the slum, mass rapid transport system, and xi. Issue any other appropriate writ or order or direction deemed fit in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity."

2. The petitioners in W.P.No.15443/2022 are seeking for the following reliefs.

"i) Grant an order declaring that the entire Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No. 01 of 2022) notified on 13/01/2022 (ANNEXURE-R) as being ultra vires the Cons

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top