Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV,
Nalini W/o Shankar T.S. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for withdrawal of the petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal of petition as not pressed. (Para 2) |
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as follows:
"The petitioners most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit to withdraw the above petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
A court can dismiss a petition as not pressed when the petitioners voluntarily withdraw their request for relief.
The court permits the withdrawal of civil petitions when the parties have settled the matter out of court, emphasizing justice and equity.
N/A
A petitioner retains the absolute right to withdraw a writ petition at any stage, and upon formal submission, the court should allow such withdrawal.
The court has discretion to allow a petitioner to withdraw their petition.
Dismissal of a petition can be based on a memo filed by the petitioner's counsel seeking withdrawal of the petition.
Discretionary power of the court in allowing withdrawal of petitions and granting liberty for future filings.
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition challenging land acquisition, dismissing it without costs.
Withdrawal of a petition is valid when procedural requirements are met, leading to case dismissal.
The court upheld the petitioner's right to unilaterally withdraw the original petition without opposition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
