Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Ishtika Homes Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
SRM Builders and Developers – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. withdrawal of petition due to settlement (Para 1) |
| 2. request for permission to withdraw (Para 2) |
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petitions.
2. The memo reads as follows:
“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The advocate for the above-named petitioners submits that they may kindly be permitted to withdraw this petition, as the lis is settled out of court and this Petition may kindly be disposed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.”
In terms of the memo, the petitions are disposed as withdrawn.
The court permits the withdrawal of civil petitions when the parties have settled the matter out of court, emphasizing justice and equity.
A court can dismiss a petition as not pressed when the petitioners voluntarily withdraw their request for relief.
The court allows withdrawal of writ petitions under Article 226 where parties settle their disputes out of court.
A petitioner retains the absolute right to withdraw a writ petition at any stage, and upon formal submission, the court should allow such withdrawal.
N/A
Parties may withdraw writ petitions when disputes are settled, leading to dismissal as infructuous.
A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition if a settlement is reached before the Trial Court.
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition challenging land acquisition, dismissing it without costs.
A party may withdraw a petition at any stage, leading to its dismissal.
The court has discretion to allow a petitioner to withdraw their petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
