Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA
A.B.Vijaya Kumar S/o Late Mr. Basappa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
The petitioner/accused No.1 is before this Court calling in question registration of crime in Crime No.65 of 2022 (original Crime No.4 of 2022) for offences punishable under Sections 7 (a) and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (‘hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).
2. Facts, in brief borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:-
The petitioner who is a public servant was at the relevant point of time working as Special Land Acquisition Officer-II of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (‘KIADB’ for short) and is presently working as Joint Director of Municipal Administration. On 21-09-2022, the 2nd respondent/complainant registers a complaint before the Deputy Superintendent of Police of the 1st respondent/Karnataka Lokayukta upon which a crime is registered in Crime No.4 of 2022. The allegation by the complainant is that the complainant is the resident in No.17, 1st Main, 10th ‘A’ Cross, Laggare Main Road, Bangalore and that an ancient Shri Dinne Duggalamma Temple is situated in Laggare Village. The temple was built in the land bearing Sy.No.147 measuring 30 guntas by a trust by name ‘Shri Dinne Duggalamma Temple Develop
Proof of demand for illegal gratification is essential to establish corruption charges under Sections 7 and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with mere return of money not sufficient without es....
Proof of demand and acceptance is essential to establish an offense under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Mere allegations without evidence fail to sustain prosecution.
Proof of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification is essential to establish corruption offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification must be established beyond reasonable doubt to sustain charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Proof of demand and acceptance of bribes is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act; mere recovery of money without evidence of demand does not establish an offence.
Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification are essential to establish offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act; mere recovery of tainted money is insufficient fo....
Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification are essential to establish offences under Sections 7 and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The demand and acceptance of bribes must be proven for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, highlighting its critical role in establishing culpability.
Illegal gratification – For presumption to operate, basic ingredients of demand and acceptance must be present in a given case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
