Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
C.T.Ravi S/o Thimmegowda – Appellant
Versus
State By Bagewadi P.S. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts leading to the petition (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner’s arguments on legislative privilege (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's counterarguments on privilege limitations (Para 5) |
| 4. complainant's claim on verbal abuse and modesty (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court’s observations on legislative immunity scope (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. legal interpretation of article 194 with case law (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. court analyzes legislative privileges and their applicability to criminal acts. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. conclusions on legislative privilege and prosecution (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. analysis of alleged offences under bns (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. court’s final determination on complaint merit (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
ORDER :
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
The petitioner, a Member of Legislative Council of the State of Karnataka now stands before this Court seeking quashing of registration of crime, in Crime No.186 of 2024, which alleges offences penal under Sections 75 and 79 of the BNS 2023.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts in brief, are as follows:-
The petitioner, a people’s representative, is said to be in public field for over 3 decades. He is presently a Member of Vidhana Parishad/Legis
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
