Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
VIBHU BAKHRU, C.M.POONACHA
Dinesh M. S/o Shri G. Muniswamy – Appellant
Versus
Provident Housing Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the appeal and prior ruling (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding exemption from registration (Para 3 , 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. court's interpretation of project completion and krera's order (Para 4 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. definitions related to ongoing projects under the act (Para 11 , 12 , 21) |
| 5. evidence presented regarding project readiness (Para 18 , 20) |
| 6. court's decision on the sustainability of the ruling and statutory remedies (Para 24 , 25) |
| 7. final ruling of the appeal and directive for further appeal process (Para 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
VIBHU BAKHRU, C.J.
1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 15.06.2023 [the impugned order] passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 15133/2020 (GM-RES).
2. Respondent No.1, M/s. Provident Housing Limited [The Developer] had filed the said writ petition impugning an order dated 28.05.2020, passed by the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority [KRERA], whereby it was directed to pay compensation at the rate of 2% of the amount paid by the appellant from April, 2017 till delivery of possession. Additionally, KRERA also directed the Developer to execute the sale deed in respect of the flat in
The court determined that unresolved factual disputes regarding project completion and jurisdiction require the Developer to pursue statutory remedies rather than direct writ petitions.
Projects receiving partial occupancy certificates prior to enactment are exempt from certain provisions of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for proper inspection and adherence to legal requirements by the competent authorities in issuing occupancy certificates for real e....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the definition of 'ongoing project' under Rule 2(h) of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate (Regulation and Deve....
The RERA Act applies to ongoing real estate projects, and the Act's provisions protect the rights of stakeholders, including home buyers and promoters.
The completion certificate issued must be strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan and specifications, and the responsibilities of the promoter include providing and maintaining essential serv....
The existence and date of issuance of occupancy certificates are critical in determining whether a real estate project is ongoing under the RERA.
The court upheld the authority's decision to allow a housing society to take over a lapsed real estate project, prioritizing home buyers' interests over private disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
