SAURABH LAVANIA
Agc Realty Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Authorized Singnatory Sateesh Chand Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Raj Rani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Saurabh Lavania, J.)
C.M. Application No.IA-01-2023
Heard.
The present appeal has been filed by the appellant along with an application for condonation of delay as the registry has indicated delay of 39 days in filing the instant appeal.
The cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay to the view of this Court is sufficient. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
Delay is condoned.
Order on Appeal
1. For the purpose of admission, Shri Abhishek Khare, learned counsel for the appellant assisted by Ms. Aahuti Agrawal says that in the instant appeal assailing the order dated 08.12.2022 passed by Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal Lucknow (in short "Lucknow") in appeal No.308 of 2019 (Smt. Rajrani and another vs. M/S Agc Realty Private Limited), the main issue revolves around the expression 'ongoing project' which expression, infact, has not been defined under the Act, namely, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (in short "Act of 2016"), however, the same has been indicated in the U.P. Real Estate Regulation And Development Rules, 2016 (in short " Rules of 2016"), particularly, Rule 2(h).
2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.