Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K S HEMALEKHA
Manjula .J, W/O Late J.C. Jagadeesha – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Justice K.N. Keshavanarayana Committee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's representation is to be considered. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel submissions acknowledging representation considerations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's order granting liberty to submit documents. (Para 4) |
| 4. writ petition disposed with instructions for the committee. (Para 5) |
ORDER :
K.S. HEMALEKHA, J.
The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the the non-consideration of her representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure-K) sent through post to the committee headed by Hon’ble Justice K.N. Keshavanarayana, constituted to consider the issues regarding allotment and deletion of lands acquired for formation of Arkavathi Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), pursuant to the directions issued in the case of K.P. Anjanappa Vs. State of Karnataka and others , W.P. No.51929/2014 & Con. Matters D.D. 27.09.2021 (K.P. Anjanappa) with the following directions:
“ORDER
(i) The challenge made to the Notifications Nos. BDA/COMMR, KLAO/LA9/104/2002-03, BANGALORE, dated: 03.02.2003, No. UDD 193 MNX 2004, BANGALORE, dated: 23.02.2004 and No. UDD 426 MNJ/2011, BANGALORE, dated 18.06.2014, stands rejected and acquisition of the lands for the formation of Arkavati Layout is up
The court directed the BDA to expedite the allotment process for land sites in accordance with previous rulings, ensuring timely responses to all representations.
The court emphasized the need for the Bangalore Development Authority to expedite the processing of land allotment applications in line with existing legal frameworks and mandates.
Acquisition of isolated lands is unjustified if neighboring lands are excluded, necessitating adherence to Committee recommendations as per judicial directives.
Lack of objection in prior acquisition proceedings bars later claims for de-notification by landowners, affirming the finality of judicial orders.
Land ownership claims based on unidentifiable sale deeds were dismissed, upholding the committee's findings due to lack of clear identification.
Court emphasized that land acquisitions must adhere to legal principles established in previous rulings, ensuring practical and logical considerations before proceeding.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
