THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K S HEMALEKHA
MAJOR (DR) ALOK GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking writ for mandamus regarding land allotment (Para 3) |
| 2. court's previous order on land allotment upheld (Para 5) |
| 3. acknowledgment of fairness in committee's representation consideration (Para 6) |
| 4. committee's obligation to review representations promptly (Para 7) |
| 5. requirement for expeditious disposal of representation (Para 8) |
ORDER :
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.1.
2. Sri Vasantha, learned counsel is directed to accept notice for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
3. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
“a) Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the Representations dated 18.03.2019 and 29.07.2019 produced along with Acknowledgement at Annexure-H, J, K and L submitted by the Petitioner before the Respondent No.2 and 3 within a specified time period in the interest of Justice and equity.
b) Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondent 1 to 3 to till the disposal of the Representations dated 18.03.2019 and 29.07.2019 produced along with acknowledgement at Annexure- H, J, K and L not to allot and dispossess Petitioner from the Site property bearing Old No:58. New No:KN
Junjamma and Others Vs. The Bangalore Development Authority, Rep by its Commissioner, BDA
The court emphasized the need for the Bangalore Development Authority to expedite the processing of land allotment applications in line with existing legal frameworks and mandates.
The court directed the BDA to expedite the allotment process for land sites in accordance with previous rulings, ensuring timely responses to all representations.
Land ownership claims based on unidentifiable sale deeds were dismissed, upholding the committee's findings due to lack of clear identification.
Acquisition of isolated lands is unjustified if neighboring lands are excluded, necessitating adherence to Committee recommendations as per judicial directives.
Lack of objection in prior acquisition proceedings bars later claims for de-notification by landowners, affirming the finality of judicial orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.