IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
P.S. Dinesh Kumar, T.G. Shivashankare Gowda, JJ.
Dr. Rajini C.K W/o Dr. Lokesh B.S - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Karnataka Represented By Its Principal Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare And Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 24070 of 2023 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 19-01-2024
MD Radio Diagnosis Seat Allotment - Medical College Seat Allotment - Karnataka Education Authority Act, National Medical Commission Act - The court found that the allotment of the MD Radio Diagnosis seat in favor of respondent No.6 was wholly illegal and set it aside. The court ordered the Karnataka Education Authority to allot the MD Radio Diagnosis seat in favor of the petitioner and issue necessary orders for her admission and attendance at the classes. The court also directed the adjustment of the fee paid by the petitioner for MS-Obstetrics and Gynaecology towards her seat in MD Radio Diagnosis at MR Medical College, Kalaburgi.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an in-service Doctor, participated in the second round of counseling for post-graduation seats in medical colleges. She was initially offered a seat in MS-Obstetrics and Gynaecology but later found that the MD Radio Diagnosis seat, which she had opted for as her third choice, was allotted to another candidate. Feeling aggrieved, she filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of the allotment list and the allotment of the MD Radio Diagnosis seat to her.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the allotment of the MD Radio Diagnosis seat in favor of respondent No.6 was wholly illegal and set it aside. The court ordered the Karnataka Education Authority to allot the MD Radio Diagnosis seat in favor of the petitioner and issue necessary orders for her admission and attendance at the classes. The court also directed the adjustment of the fee paid by the petitioner for MS-Obstetrics and Gynaecology towards her seat in MD Radio Diagnosis at MR Medical College, Kalaburgi.
Issues: The main issue was the legality of the allotment of the MD Radio Diagnosis seat, specifically whether it was allotted in accordance with the relevant regulations and whether the petitioner was unfairly deprived of the seat.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the allotment of the MD Radio Diagnosis seat to respondent No.6 was illegal as it was made in violation of the regulations and deprived the petitioner of her rightful entitlement. The court emphasized the duty of the Karnataka Education Authority to practice fair and transparent methods of seat allotment.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the allotment of the MD Radio Diagnosis seat in favor of respondent No.6, and directed the Karnataka Education Authority to allot the seat to the petitioner, along with necessary instructions for her admission and fee adjustment.
ORDER :
P.S. Dinesh Kumar, J.
This writ petition is presented with following prayers:
(ii) Issue writ or order in the nature of Mandamus or such order this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to Consider the 1st representation dated 25.10.2023 made to Respondent produced at Annexure-B.
(iii) Issue writ or order in the nature of Mandamus or such order this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to Consider the 2nd representation dated 25.10.2023 made to Respondent produced at Annexure-B-1.
(iv) Issue writ or order in the nature of Mandamus or such order this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to Consider the 3rd representation dated 25.10.2023 made to Respondent produced at Annexure-B-2.
(v) Issue writ or order in the nature of Mandamus or such order this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to Consider the 4th representation dated 25.10.2023 made to Respondent produced at Annexure-B-3.
(vi) To direct the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondent to allot the MD Radio Diagnosis Seat at MRMC Gulburga to the Petitioner.
(vii) Grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.
2. We have heard Shri. G. S. Kannur, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner, Shri. Sudev Hegde, learned AGA for the State, Shri. N.K. Ramesh, learned Advocate for the KEA[Karnataka Education Authority], Shri. N. Ketty, learned Advocate for the NMC[National Medical Commission] and Ms. Belle Ravivarma Kumar, learned Advocate for respondent No.6.
3. Brief facts of the case are, petitioner is an in-service Doctor working in Anegola Primary Health Centre, K.R.Pete Taluk, Mandya District under the Department of Health and Family Welfare [‘HFW Department’ for short], Government of Karnataka. On 19.08.2023, the State Government issued a notification fixing 20% of seats in post graduation for in-service candidates. Pursuant to the notification, the Directorate of Medical Education[‘the DME’ for short] published a Seat matrix for 315 seats.
4. On 02.10.2023, the DME announced 264 Seat for the second round of counselling. The seat in ‘MD Radio Diagnosis’ at MR Medical College, Kalaburgi was reserved for in-service candidate from HFW Department.
5. Petitioner’s case is, she opted for ‘MD Radio Diagnosis’ at MRMC, Kalaburgi as her third option. According to her, on 19.09.2023, when she appeared for the second round of counselling, she was offered a seat in ‘MS-Obstetrics and Gynaecology’, which she opted. Later she learnt that on 20.10.2023, respondent No.6, who is from ESI Department was allotted the ‘MD radio Diagnosis’ seat at MRMC, Kalaburgi reserved for HFW Department. Feeling aggrieved, petitioner has filed this writ petition.
6. Shri. Kannur, for the petitioner, praying to allow the writ petition, submitted that:
later petitioner learnt that MD Radio Diagnosis seat has been given to respondent No.6 from ESI Department who is not eligible.
the KEA had deliberately blocked the seat in favour of respondent No.6, which is unsustainable in law;
the action of respondents in allotting seat to respondent No. 6 is arbitrary. It has affected petitioner's academic career, hence, violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
7. Opposing the writ petition, Shri. N.K. Ramesh, for the KEA, submitted that: • a seat in Dermatology was allotted to one K.V. Nagaraj in Raichur Institute of Medical Science;
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the Karnataka Education Authority to ensure fair and transparent methods of seat allotment, and the illegality of allotting seats....
The court upheld the principle of merit-cum-choice in admissions, confirming that procedural fairness is essential when rectifying errors in provisional seat allotment results.
No legal right vested in the petitioner for allocation of vacant seat, as admission processes are bound by established counseling protocols, reflecting the principle of no fault leading to no prejudi....
The admissions of the petitioners were declared unsustainable and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. They were directed to participate in the special stray vacancy round of coun....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity to uphold the integrity and efficiency of the educational admission system, precluding measures that would induce extensive delays an....
Technical glitches in online portals cannot justify leaving seats vacant, and courts can direct special measures to fill such vacancies.
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.