IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
JAYANT BANERJI, K. V. ARAVIND
Laxman S/o Hanamanthappa Bidari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to cess imposed for lake rejuvenation (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. amendment impacts validity of prior provisions (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial observations on legislative competency (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. ruling based on constitutional provisions and precedents (Para 9) |
| 5. appeal lacks merit and is dismissed (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellants.
2. Under challenge in the Writ Petition was an order imposing cess/fees for lake rejuvenation under purported exercise of powers conferred by clause (v) of Section 18A(1) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 2011, Amendment Act, 2011. The aforesaid provision of the Amendment Act, 2011 was also challenged. The learned single Judge relying upon an order dated 21.01.2015 passed in W.P.No.103406/2013 and connected petitions, wherein similar questions were raised, had noted observations made in previous judgments and found that the petition is squarely covered by the order passed in the aforesaid W.P.No.103406/2013, which would enable the Municipal Authorities to impose the cess/fee.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed I.A.No.1/2017 and p
The court affirmed the legislative competency of the State to impose fees for lake rejuvenation despite amendments, concluding that previous valid actions remain unaffected by subsequent legislative ....
The court quashed the unconstitutional amendments, declaring prior fees as sufficient for development plans, prohibiting additional charges linked to market value.
The Court declared the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Amendment Act, 2021 and related demands unconstitutional, emphasizing the illegality of fee linkage to market value and ensuring no double char....
Amendments to municipal fee structures were quashed for failing to rectify judicially identified legal flaws, emphasizing the principle of quid pro quo in administrative fees.
The amendments to the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Town Planning acts involving fee levies are unconstitutional and only applicable to larger plots, prohibiting duplicate fees for changes in ....
Court emphasized the necessity for authorities to comply with judicial orders or face contempt proceedings for non-compliance, reinforcing the rule of law.
The High Court quashed amendments deemed unconstitutional, establishing fees for development plans apply only to larger plots and declaring prior fee collections prevent new levies.
The court affirmed that provisions imposing fees on smaller plots and linking them to market value are illegal, ensuring adherence to prior authoritative rulings.
Change of user of land - prescription made in the Rules framed in terms of Sec.27A(3) of the Amendment Act, stipulates that the amount to be paid is much lesser than the 50% of the fair value of the ....
The court declared certain municipal amendment acts unconstitutional and quashed illegal fees imposed based on market value linkage, affirming prior judicial precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.