Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Rayappa S/o Channabasappa Kittur – Appellant
Versus
Government of Karnataka, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Bengaluru – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following reliefs:
In WP 104280/2025
i) a writ of certiorari quashing the endorsements bearing No.SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A(1030) dated 30/01/2025, endorsement bearing No.SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A(4280) dated 05/03/2025, endorsement bearing No. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024- 25/KSR3A(4915) DATED 10/03/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A (3981) DATED 03/03/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A(3982) DATED 03/03/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM- 1/01/2024-25/KSR3A (3980) DATED 03/03/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024- 25/KSR3A(1645) DATED 06/02/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A (1344) DATED 03/02/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A(2807) DATED 21/02/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM- 1/01/2024-25/KSR3A (1519) DATED 05/02/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024- 25/KSR3A(2331) DATED 15/02/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A (4303) DATED 05/03/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM-1/01/2024-25/KSR3A(2803) DATED 21/02/2025, ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SPLOCA/CLM- 1/01/2024
A competent authority must provide clear reasoning for rejecting claims and allow for resubmission of evidence under the KPIDFE Act.
Claim rejections without justification violate due process; authorities must provide reasons and thoroughly verify supporting documents under the KPIDFE Act.
Point of law: Mandal Revenue Officer shall determine as to whether, and if so in what manner, the record of rights may be amended in consequence therefor and shall carryout the amendment in the recor....
The court affirmed that improper endorsements preventing property registration and E Khatha issuance were quashed, highlighting the need for prompt administrative procedures to uphold property rights....
The Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2004 overrides the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, prohibiting the Dy. Registrar from adjudicating disputes once a ....
The Court affirmed the principle that administrative authorities must consider applications regarding rights under scrutiny before judicial intervention.
The court upheld the attachment of properties under the KPIDFE Act, emphasizing the necessity to protect depositors' interests despite the appellants' claims of procedural impropriety and lack of com....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
