SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2712

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Mr. Aprameya Radhakrishna – Petitioner
Versus
Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 6(1)(1), Bangalore – Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 1968 of 2023 (T-IT)
Decided On : 12-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Manasa Ananthan, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. E.I. Sanmathi, Advocate

Notices issued for reassessment under the Income Tax Act must adhere to statutory time limits; those issued beyond the time limit are considered invalid.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148 and 148A(d) - Notice for reassessment - Petitioner challenged the validity of notices and orders based on delayed issuance beyond the statutory time limit following Apex Court directions in Ashish Agarwal's case - Respondent issued notices after the deadline, rendering them invalid. (Paras 3, 6, 10)

(B) Legal Principles - The court emphasized that notices issued under the old regime should be considered valid only if they followed prescribed time limits after the issuance of relevant materials to assessees. (Paras 6, 10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner sought to challenge the initiation of reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2016-17, arguing the impugned notification and order were issued after the limitation period outlined by the Supreme Court.

Findings of Court:
The court found the notices and orders were issued after the expiration of the legal time limit, concluding they were invalid.

Issues: Whether the impugned notices and orders were issued within the statutory time limits established by applicable court rulings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that notices must adhere strictly to the determined limitation period for validity, quashing those issued beyond the statutory timeframe.

Result: The petition is hereby allowed.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks quashing of notices and orders due to limitation. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. court analyzes procedural requirements based on past judgments. (Para 2 , 7 , 9)
3. respondent argues there is no merit in the petition. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court concludes notices and orders are invalid due to timing. (Para 8)

ORDER :

S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

“(a) Quashing the instruction bearing No.1/2022 (F.No.279/Misc/M-51/2022-ITJ) dated 11.05.2022 issued by the 3rd Respondent (Annexure-G), to the extent questioned herein;

(b) Quashing the order dated 29.07.2022 bearing No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044301602(1) (Annexure- K) passed by the 1st Respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Act, rejecting the Petitioner’s objection as to the initiation of the reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2016-17;

(c) Quashing the notice dated 29.07.2022 issued by the 1st Respondent (Annexure-L) under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17; and

(d) Pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fir in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in relation to the assessment year 2016-17, the respondent No.1 issued a notice dated 29.06.2021 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, prior to the said provisions being amended w.e.f., 01.04.2021. Subsequently, in the case of Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal [2022] 138 taxmann.com 64 (SC), the Apex Court while dealing with the aforesaid amendment and notices issued to the assessee under subsequent to the amendment, issued the following directions:

“10. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present Appeals are ALLOWED IN PART. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified and substituted as under:

(i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be showcause notices in terms of section 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assessees information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the assesees can reply to the showcause notices within two weeks thereafter;

(ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a onetime measure visàvis those notices which have been issued under section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior approval of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the concerned Assessing Officers to hold any enquiry, if required;

(iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms of section 148A(d) in respect of each of the concerned assessees; Thereafter after following the procedure as required under section 148A may issue notice under section 148 (as substituted);

(iv) All defences which may be available to the assesses including those available under section 149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentions which may be available to the concerned assessees and Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021 and in law shall continue to be available.”

4. In pursuance of aforesaid directions issued by the Apex Court, PAN INDIA which applied to the petitioner and the notice dated 29.06.2021 also, which was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top