SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2860

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Airbus group india pvt. Ltd., Rep. Herein by its head of taxation mr. Somyajit mallick – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 1268 Of 2023 (T-IT)
Decided On : 04-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri. E.I. Sanmathi, Adv.

Notices issued under sections 148 and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act beyond the specified limitation period are invalid and subject to quashing.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act - Section 148 and 148A(d) - Quashing of notices issued beyond the limitation period - The notices and order for reassessment for the assessment year 2016-17 were issued after the deadline established under the Supreme Court judgments in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal, thereby rendering them invalid. (Paras 3, 4, 9)

(B) Limitation period for reassessment - The law clearly defines the procedure and time frames within which assessment notices must be issued post-amendment, and failure to adhere to these timelines results in invalidation of such notices. (Paras 6, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the reassessment notice and associated orders which were issued after the designated deadline following amendments in the law as dictated by the Supreme Court in previous rulings on similar issues. The notices were said to be time-barred as they were issued on 29.07.2022, after the cutoff of 09.06.2022.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the issuing of notices was invalid due to the expiration of the statutory time limits. The orders passed related to these notices were likewise quashed.

Issues: Whether the notices and subsequent order were issued within the prescribed limitation period as per the amended provisions of the law.

Ratio Decidendi: The notices under section 148 of the Income Tax Act must be issued within the timeline specified following the rulings in previous cases that detail how to calculate the limitation period, thus confirming the quashing of the notices as they were time-barred.

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's relief sought. (Para 1)
2. assessment notice procedure outlined. (Para 3 , 4)
3. counterarguments presented. (Para 5 , 8)
4. limitation and validity of notices explained. (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER :

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

1. In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

“(a) Quashing the instruction bearing No.1/2022 (F.NO.279/Misc/m-51/2022-ITJ) dated 11.05.2022 issued by the 3RD Respondent (Annexure-H) to the extent questioned herein;

(b) Quash the order dated 29.07.2022 bearing No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044295407(1)

(Annexure – L0 passed by the 1st Respondent under section 148A(d) of the Act, rejecting the Petitioner’s objection as to the initiation of the reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2016-17;

(c) Quash the notice date 29.07.2022 issued by the 1st Respondent (annexure-M) to the petitioner under section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17; and

(d) Pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the ase, in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in relation to the assessment year 2016-17, the respondent No.1 issued a notice dated 30.06.2021 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, prior to the said provisions being amended w.e.f., 01.04.2021. Subsequently, in the case of Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal [2022] 138 taxmann.com 64 (SC), the Apex Court while dealing with the aforesaid amendment and notices issued to the assessee under subsequent to the amendment, issued the following directions:

“10. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present Appeals are ALLOWED IN PART. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified and substituted as under:

(i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be showcause notices in terms of section 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assessees information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the assesees can reply to the showcause notices within two weeks thereafter;

(ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a onetime measure visàvis those notices which have been issued under section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior approval of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the concerned Assessing Officers to hold any enquiry, if required;

(iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms of section 148A(d) in respect of each of the concerned assessees; Thereafter after following the procedure as required under section 148A may issue notice under section 148 (as substituted);

(iv) All defences which may be available to the assesses including those available under section 149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentions which may be available to the concerned assessees and Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021 and in law shall continue to be available.”

4. In pursuance of aforesaid directions issued by the Apex Court, PAN INDIA which applied to the petitioner and the notice dated 30.06.2021 also, which was directed to be treated as a notice under Section 148 AB of the Income Tax Act (as amended), the resp


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top