SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2998

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K S HEMALEKHA
SMT BHAGYA B R – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. review petition context and background. (Para 1)
2. legal requirements for hearing review petitions. (Para 2 , 3)
3. limits of review jurisdiction and error standards. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. final decision to dismiss review petition. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

1. The review petitioners seek to review the order dated 29.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 48330/2018, whereby the Writ Petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed.

2. Heard Sri. Vijay Krishna Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Harisha A.S, learned AGA, for respondent No.2 and Sri S.N.Murthy, learned senior counsel for respondent No.3 and perused the material on record including the order under review.

3. The present review petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC. Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC contemplates as under:

1. Application for review of judgment:

(1) Any person considering himself aggrieved—

(a) by a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed, but from which no appeal has been preferred, (b) by a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed, or (c) by a decision on a reference from a Court of Small Causes, and who, from the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, afte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top