Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
Bedimon.S, S/o. Sasidharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Rep. By The Secretary To Government Health & Family Welfare (K) Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of review petition challenging dismissal of original petition. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues tribunal error; respondent claims no review ground. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. statutory framework of review under section 114 and order xlvii cpc examined. (Para 5) |
Order :
Muralee Krishna S., J.
The petitioner in O.P.(KAT)No.322 of 2017 filed this review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/wSection 114of theCode of Civil Procedure, 1908(‘CPC’ for short), pleading that there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 10.02.2026 passed by this Court in that original petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Tribunal failed to consider what is the actual grievance of the petitioner and the question of law raised by the petitioner is left unanswered even though Annexure A2 order dated 06.07.2015 passed by the Senior Administrative Officer and Annexure A3 order dated 31.12.2016, passed by the Government, are produced and challenged in the original application. The said omission on the part of the Tribunal to consider the grievance of the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
