D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

( 1 ) THE constitutional validity of the maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) act, 1999, forms the basis of challenge in this batch of petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution. These petitions have been placed before the Full Bench by the Learned Chief Justice, in pursuance of a reference made on 3rd september, 2004 by a Division Bench. Though the Act has been challenged on several grounds, arguments before the Court have been confined to the legislative competence of the State Legislature to enact the law. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the State had fairly stated before the Court that it would become necessary for the Court to deal with the other challenges only in the event that this Court does not accept the principal challenge on the ground of a want of legislative competence. We have come to the conclusion that the provisions of the Act are ultra vires for want of legislative competence in the state Legislature. II facts :

( 2 ) THE petitioner in Writ Petition 5186 of 2001, was a whole time Director of Pennar Paterson Securities Limited, a company incorporated under the companie