State of Maharashtra vs Ramesh Vishwanath Darandale

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1689

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, SANDEEP K.SHINDE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Vishwanath Darandale – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Deepak Thakare, P.P. a/w Mr. J.P. Yagnik,
For the Accused :Vijay Hiremath a/w Sahana i/b Swaraj Jadhav, Nitin Shivram Satpute a/w Divya R. Gupta, R3, Dr. Yug M. Chaudhry a/w Ragini Ahuja, Advocates.

Table of Content
1. accused found guilty and sentenced (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 16 , 19 , 20)
2. court's analysis and observations on evidence (Para 25 , 28 , 46 , 49 , 54 , 56 , 88 , 105 , 117)
3. arguments and disputations from defense (Para 27 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 63 , 68 , 70 , 72 , 75 , 91)
4. determination of culpability and sentencing (Para 78 , 90 , 94 , 102 , 115)
5. final judgment and sentencing order (Para 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 123)

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep K. Shinde J.

1. The appellants in the above Appeals were found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to death. The Learned Sessions Judge, Nashik, thus submitted the proceedings to this Court under Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code, for confirmation of death sentence. Besides, appellants were also found guilty of offence punishable under Section 201 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and each were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1689

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, SANDEEP K.SHINDEState of Maharashtra – AppellantVersusRamesh Vishwanath Darandale – Respondent

Cases Referred (30)

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, SANDEEP K.SHINDE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Vishwanath Darandale – Respondent