A.A.SAYED, DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, P.D.NAIK
Yash Pramesh Rana of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
Introduction:
Emancipation through Education:
A boy began the battle. It was in 1856. Branded by birth as a Dalit, he wanted to join a school in Bombay Presidency. It raised a storm, a storm of indignation and disbelief. And that boy’s battle for admission has changed the course of Indian educational history. But the battle has not ceased, it seems. It continues in one form or another—in the arena of courts, though.
2. It was in June 1856 that boy applied for admission into a government school in Dharwar, Bombay Presidency. The incident had created a furore in the administration; that ultimately attracted the attention of the rulers. The East India Company was forced to formulate an educational policy. That policy mandated that if the schools were maintained by the government, the ‘classes of its subjects’ were to be given admission without any distinction of caste, religion, and race. But that policy did not translate into action. Until 1872, education remained the privilege of the few. That year, Mahatma Phule contested the discrimination in acce
Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
AL Kalra v. P & E Corporation of India Ltd.
Ashutosh Gupta v State of Rajasthan
Bachan Singh v State of Punjab
Deepak Sibal v Punjab University
EP Royappa v State of Tamil Nadu
Indira Sawhney v Union of India
Islamic Academy of Education v State of Karnatka
Kathi Raning Rawat v State of Saurashtra
Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation
Netai Bag v State of West Bengal.
P.A. Inamdar v State of Maharashtra
Ram Prasad Sahi v State of Bihar
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Roop Chand Adlakha v Delhi Development Authority
S. Seshachalam v Chairman, Bar Council of T.N.
Shri Rama Krishna Dalmia v Shri. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
State of Maharashtra v Manubhai
State of Punjab v Dayanand Medical College
State of Rajasthan v Rao Manohar Singhji
State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v State of Karnataka
Union of India v All India Services Pensioners’ Association
Western UP Electric Power and Supply Corporation Ltd., v State of UP
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.