SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MANISH PITALE, R.N. LADDHA, JJ.
Girish Chodankar S/o. Raya Chodankar & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Speaker, Goa Legislative Assembly, Porvorim, Goa & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1228 of 2021 (Filing) With Misc. Civil Application No. 1673 of 2021 (Filing) And Writ Petition No. 1530 of 2021 (Filing)
Decided On : 24-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Vivek Tankha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil Tagotra and Mr. Abhijit Gosavi, Mr. Ujjwal Sharma, Mr. Athnain Naik, Mr. Tushar Saigal and Mr. Ankur Das.
For the Respondents:Mr. Devidas Pangam with Mr. Parikshit Sawant, Mr. Darius J. Khambata, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Vaze, Mr. P. Vaze and Mr. Luis Fernandes, Mr. V.R. Dhond, Mr. Prasad Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vibhav Amonkar and Mr. Sanjay Sardesai.

Headnote:

Election Commission of India – Elections - Political Matters - Petitions for Disqualification of Members of Legislative Assembly - Petitions Challenge Orders - Writ Petition is filed by President of the Goa Pradesh Congress Committee (GPCC), which is a State unit of political party Indian National Congress (INC), for State of Goa - Petitioner has challenged order passed by the Respondent no.1-Speaker of the Goa State Legislative Assembly, whereby Disqualification Petition filed by the Petitioner seeking disqualification of Respondent nos. 2 to 11, was dismissed by the Respondent no.1 - whether sub-paragraphs (1) and (2) thereof operate in distinct and independent fields and whether there is a 'twin test' contemplated under the said paragraph for merger of political party to afford protection from disqualification of Member of a House? - (2) Whether sub-paragraphs (1) and (2) of paragraph 4 of the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution are disjunctive, wherein sub-paragraph (1) is a complete code in itself and sub-paragraph (2) concerns only a deeming fiction? - (3) Whether concept of split of a political party contemplated under paragraph 3 (now deleted) of the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution, is the same as the concept of merger of a political party under paragraph 4 of the said Schedule? – Held, It was for legislature to lay down threshold of political morality while introducing the Tenth Schedule for addressing the evil of unprincipled defections by elected members of political parties - It was held that the Courts would have nothing else to go by, except the legislative wisdom in this arena - Perception of legislature regarding political proprieties and moral standards was recognised by the Supreme Court, while emphasising that there was a need to provide for “floor-crossing” on the basis of honest dissent - we conclude that the Petitioners have not been able to make out a case for interference in impugned Orders passed by Respondent no.1-Speaker and we hold that the Disqualification Petitions filed by the Petitioners were correctly dismissed by Respondent no.1 - Writ Petitions stand dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Manish Pitale, J.

These two Writ Petitions challenge orders passed by the Speaker of the Goa Legislative Assembly dismissing petitions filed for disqualification of respondent Members of the Legislative Assembly. The Speaker has held that the said respondents did not invite disqualification, as the deeming fiction under paragraph 4(2) of the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution operated in their favour. The Petitioners have, inter alia, raised the question of political morality and as to whether the orders passed by the Speaker are in furtherance of the object with which the Tenth Schedule was introduced in the Constitution. In order to appreciate the contentions raised on behalf of the rival parties, it is necessary to first refer to the factual background.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND :

Writ Petition No. 1228 of 2021

1. This Writ Petition is filed by the President of the Goa Pradesh Congress Committee (GPCC), which is a State unit of the political party Indian National Congress (INC), for the State of Goa. The Petitioner has challenged order dated 20.04.2021 passed by the Respondent no.1-Speaker of the Goa State Legislative Assembly, whereby Disqualification Petition No. 3 of 2019 filed by the Petitioner seeking disqualification of Respondent nos. 2 to 11, was dismissed by the Respondent no.1.

2. On 11.03.2017, election was held for the State of Goa and as per the results declared by the Election Commission of India, the following was the tally of elected members belonging to various political parties and independent candidates :

1.

Indian National Congress (INC)

17

2.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)

13

3.

Maharashtra Gomantak Party (MGP)

3

4.

Goa Forward Party (GFP)

3

5.

National Congress Party (NCP)

1

6.

Independents

03

 

TOTAL

40

3. The elected members of the BJP along with MGP, the GFP and the independents, formed the Government in the State of Goa. Later, one of the Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA), representing the INC from the Valpoi Constituency resigned from membership of the INC and gave up membership of the Legislative Assembly also. Thereafter, in October 2018, two members of the Legislative Assembly belonging to the INC, resigned from the assembly and joined BJP. In this process, the MLAs belonging to the INC, were reduced to 14. Thereafter, on 17.03.2019, the then Chief Minister of Goa passed away and an MLA of the BJP was appointed as the Chief Minister along with two Deputy Chief Ministers belonging to the MGP and GFP. In the election conducted for the seat that fell vacant due to demise of the then Chief Minister, Respondent no.11 contested and won as an INC candidate. Thus, tally of INC rose to 15.

4. On 10.07.2019, Respondent nos. 2 to 11, claiming to be two-thirds of the legislative party of the INC in the assembly, decided to join the BJP and informed the Respondent no.1-Speaker. On this basis, the Respondent no.1-Speaker allotted them seats in the Assembly along with the members of the BJP. The office of the Goa Legislative Assembly issued bulletin dated 10.07.2019, recording that INC Legislature Party in the Goa Assembly decided to merge with the BJP and that, accordingly, the ten members i.e. Respondent nos. 2 to 11 herein, were allotted seats along with the members of the BJP in the house.

5. On 08.08.2019, the Petitioner instituted Disqualification Petition no. 3 of 2019, against Respondent nos. 2 to 11 before the Respondent no.1 on the basis of a Resolution dated 24.07.2019, passed by the Goa Pradesh Congress Committee authorizing the Petitioner to file such a Petition. According to the Petitioner, the Respondent nos. 2 to 11 deserved to be declared as disqualified from holding membership of the house, as they had voluntarily given up membership of their original party i.e. INC, thereby attracting disqualification under the Tenth Schedule to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top