Back
PRASANNA B. VARALE, KISHORE C. SANT
Surendra Shamsundar Jeware – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial filing process of writ petition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. details regarding municipal council's agenda and resolution. (Para 8 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. petitioner's objections to the allotment process. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 30) |
| 4. court's analysis on the legality of the process. (Para 39 , 40 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. court's decision to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 84) |
JUDGMENT :
Kishore C. Sant, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent of learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. This petition was initially filed as a Public Interest Litigation bearing PIL No.86 of 2021. Upon objection raised by learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 5 and 6 that the petitioner has personal interest in allotment of the writ lands in his favour and pursuant to request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this court (Hon’ble the Chief Justice & M.S. Karnik J.) vide order dated 20th December 2021 was pleased to allow conversion of Public Interest Litigation into a Writ Petition. PIL No.86 of 2021 is thus treated as Writ Petition bearing No.9498 of 2021.
3. The petitioner by way of this petition seeks relief of quashing Resolution No.18 dated 28th May 2021 passed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
