IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
PRASANNA B. VARALE, KISHORE C. SANT, JJ.
Surendra Shamsundar Jeware & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 9498 of 2021 Alongwith Public Interest Litigation No. 96 of 2021
Decided On : 04-10-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial filing process of writ petition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. details regarding municipal council's agenda and resolution. (Para 8 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. petitioner's objections to the allotment process. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 30) |
| 4. court's analysis on the legality of the process. (Para 39 , 40 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. court's decision to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 84) |
JUDGMENT :
Kishore C. Sant, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent of learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. This petition was initially filed as a Public Interest Litigation bearing PIL No.86 of 2021. Upon objection raised by learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 5 and 6 that the petitioner has personal interest in allotment of the writ lands in his favour and pursuant to request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this court (Hon’ble the Chief Justice & M.S. Karnik J.) vide order dated 20th December 2021 was pleased to allow conversion of Public Interest Litigation into a Writ Petition. PIL No.86 of 2021 is thus treated as Writ Petition bearing No.9498 of 2021.
3. The petitioner by way of this petition seeks relief of quashing Resolution No.18 dated 28th May 2021 passed by respondent no.6-Municipal Council, Baramati (“the Council”), whereby the Council has resolved to allot the writ lands admeasuring 3,408 sq.mtrs. in favour of respondent no.7-Natraj Natya Kala Mandal (“the Trust”). The petitioner further prayed for quashing of Resolution No.5 dated 12th July 2021 passed by respondent no.6-Council, whereby the Council has resolved to move an application for change of user in respect of the writ lands. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing of an order dated 18th August 2021 passed by respondent no.1-State granting approval to the proposal of respondent no.6-Council, thereby permitting allotment of land in favour of respondent no.7-Trust on a long term basis.
4. By way of amendment, the petitioner prayed for allotment of the writ lands bearing Survey Nos.908 to 914, situated at Baramati City for any of the public purposes, if at all the said lands are not required by respondent no.6-Council in the foreseeable future either by public auction or by inviting tenders from public or by inviting applications from persons or bodies of persons eligible for allotment of plots etc.
Brief facts :-
5. One Advocate Amarendra Dattatray Mahadik, the Executive Chairman of respondent no.7-Trust, had made an application to the President, Municipal Council, Baramati on 18th May 2021 requesting for allotment of an area of 183.90 sq.mtrs. out of lands bearing City Survey Nos.908 to 913, to respondent no.6-Council on a long term / perpetual lease at a nominal rate. The application further states that this land is required by Natraj Natya Kala Mandal, Baramati – respondent No.7, which is in existence since 1979 and is engaged in various cultural and social activities.
6. The said Natraj Natya Kala Mandal, respondent no.7 is registered as a Public Trust. The said Trust has arranged many public awareness programmes and conducted cultural and social activities. Presently, the trust is working from a building near ‘Teen Hathi’ Chowk, which is a land belonging to the Irrigation Department. In the said land, the respondent no.6-Council has resolved to carry a work of development and beautification of canal named as ‘Nira Dawa Kalwa’. Due to the said work, the building from which the work is being carried out is getting affected. Since the project of development and beautification of canal undertaken by respondent no.6-Council is an important project, adding beauty of the city, the Trust is ready to handover lands in its possession for the said project. Thus, after surrendering possession of the land to the Irrigation Department, the Trust needs another land. The lands bearing City Survey Nos.908 to 914 are adjacent to the earlier plot of land that was in possession of the Trust. It is further stated in the application that the land applied b
Pragati Mahila Mandal, Nanded Vs. Municipal Council, Nanded and Ors.
Zenit Metaplast Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
Humanity and Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Institute of Law, Chandigarh and Ors. Vs. Neeraj Sharma and Ors.
Bangalore Medical Trust Vs. B.S. Muddappa and Ors.
Purushottam Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors., along with connected matters
Harijan Layout Sudhar Samiti and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Superintendent & Legal Remembrancer State of West Bengal Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Netai Bag and Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.
M.P. Oil Extraction and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. and Ors.
Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy and Ors. Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Anr.
Natural Resources Allocation, in RE. Special Reference No.1 of 2012
G.B. Mahajan and Ors. Vs. Jalgaon Municipal Council and Ors.
The authority to alienate municipal land must comply with statutory provisions; resolutions made in violation of such authority are legally unenforceable. The suit was time-barred, highlighting signi....
Government actions in granting licenses must align with principles of reasonableness and public interest, ensuring no arbitrary decision-making that creates monopolies.
State actions regarding license distribution must comply with fairness, non-arbitrariness, and promote public interest by avoiding monopolies.
The court upheld the government's policy for land allotment to promote the film industry, emphasizing compliance with Article 14 and the importance of transparency in public contracts.
Government actions must be in conformity with reason and public interest. The Government cannot act arbitrarily and must act for the public good.
Service Law - Allotment of flat - Rule 7(i) of Policy provides that no application shall be entertained for accommodation if employee is retiring on superannuation in next six months, meaning there b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.