IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Anand S/o Sheshrao Bharose – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Vedprakash Kashirao Patil – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 3268 of 2021, 6268, 6314, 6331, 6355, 6352, 7866, 7865, 7866 of 2019
Decided on : 21-12-2022
Key Points: - (!) (!) - (!) (!) - (!) (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of sanjivani education society and control disputes (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. judicial challenge regarding change report enquiry findings (Para 3 , 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. arguments presented by bharose group on membership validity (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. arguments and challenges by patil group on the membership claims (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. court's analysis of membership admission validity (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 6. final conclusion directing formation of trusting governing body (Para 80 , 81 , 82) |
JUDGMENT :
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties taken up for final hearing.
A. P ROLOGUE
2. Sanjivani Education Society, a registered trust under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (for the sake of brevity hereinafter referred as to the ‘Trust Act’) in the year 1979, has established total 31 educational institutions in Parbhani district consisting of twenty five primary and secondary schools, four junior colleges, one senior college and one military school. The trust, established with a noble objective of making available educational facilities amongst the members of public in the year 1979, has now embroiled itself into serious disputes relating to control over its management and affairs. As of today, there are two rival groups who are asserting rights to manage and control affairs of the trust. One of the groups was led by late Shri Sheshrao D. Bharose, the founder Chairman of the trust and since he is no more, his son Shri Anand S. Bharose now leads this group (for the sake of convenience this group is referred in the present judgment as ‘Bharose Group’). The other group consists of three surviving founder trustees viz Dr. Vedprakash Kashirao Patil, Shri Vitthal Govindrao Bhosale and Shri Shivaji Narayanrao Kakde (for the sake of convenience this group is referred in the present judgment as ‘Patil Group’).
B. THE CHALLENGE
3. The subject matter of challenge in this group of petitions is the judgment and order dated 07th May, 2019 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Aurangabad (for short “J.C.C.”) thereby confirming the judgment and order dated 29th April, 2017 passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Parbhani (for short “A.C.C.”). Numerous Change Reports have been decided as a result of these orders of the JCC and ACC, the lead Change Report Enquiry being No. 190/2010. Patil Group has emerged victorious in the bitter battle for control of the Trust, with the J.C.C. directing the Patil Group to take necessary steps for formation of various bodies to constitute governing council, which is directed to act as the legal body of the trust.
C. FACTUAL MATRIX :
4. Sanjivani Education Society came to be registered under the provisions of the Trust Act in the year 1979. The trust had eight founder members as under:
Sr. No. Name of the Member Position
1. Shri S. D. Bharose Chairman
2. Dr. V. K. Patil Vice Chairman
3. Shri D. A. Solunke Secretary
4. Shri V. G. Bhosale Joint Secretary
5. Shri Raghubai Patel Member
6. Shri B.G. Nirwal Member
7. Mrs. Sarnaik Member
8. Shri S. N. Kakde Member
5. The transitory governing council under the Chairmanship of Shri Sheshrao D. Bharose was looking after the entire administration of the trust as a Governing Council. The tenure of the transitory governing council as per the constitution of the trust was three years and it appears that no further elections were held to constitute the governing council after the year 1982.
6. In the year 2003, Chang Report Enquiry No. 527 of 2003 came to be filed before the A.C.C., Parbhani by the founder Secretary Shri Dalpatrao Solanke on the basis of alleged general body meeting dated 02.11.2003 electing managing committee for the period 2003 to 2006. In that change report, Chairman Shri Sheshrao D. Bharose filed an application along with list of 25 persons claiming that they were admitted as members of the trust. The application was objected by Secretary Shri Dalpatrao A. Solanke.
Abdul Razak (Dead) Through L.Rs. Vs. Mangesh Rajaram Wagle and others
Achutananda Baidya Vs. Prafullya Kumar Gayen and others
B.V. Smitha Rani Vs. M. K. Girish
Barium Chemicals Ltd. and another Vs. Company Law Board and others
Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar Vs. Mohamed Haji Latif and others
Jai Singh and others Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others
J. M. Construction Vs. Shamrock Impex
M/s Sanjay Cotton Co. Partnership Firm, Akola Vs. M/s Omprakash Shioprakash and another
Madholal Sindhu Vs. Asian Assurance Company Ltd. and others
Narbada Devi Gupta Vs. Birendra Kumar Jaiswal and another
Om Prakash Berlia and another Vs. Unit Trust of India and others
Ramji Dayawala and Sons (P) Ltd. Vs. Invest Import
Smt. M. M. Amonkar and others Vs. Dr. S. A. Johari
Savita Chemicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Dyes and Chemical Workers’ Union
Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others
Shalini Shyam Shetty and another Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil
State of Bombay Vs. Purushottam Jog Naik
Sait Tarajee Khimchand and others Vs. Yelamarti Satyam and others
Thimmappa Rai Vs. Ramanna Rai and others
Vithalrao Kharpade Vs. Motiram Narsingrao Birajdar reported in 2010 (1) Mh.L.J. 977.
Vidhyadhar Vs. Manikrao and another reported in AIR 1999 SC 1441
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a judgment or decree obtained by playing fraud on the court is a nullity and non est in the eyes of the law. The court emphasized that an orde....
The court established that the Charity Commissioner has the authority to examine the legality of membership and the validity of meetings under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, and that change....
The court affirmed that interested persons in public trust matters have the right to join proceedings, and the concept of abatement does not apply, ensuring that inquiries can continue effectively.
The Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by excluding members enrolled after 16 May 1999 from the voters list; their membership validity must be determined in future proceedings.
The Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by excluding members enrolled after 16 May 1999 from the voters list; their membership validity must be determined in future proceedings.
The Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by excluding members enrolled after 16 May 1999, contrary to a prior ruling, emphasizing that membership validity must be determined in appropriate proceedi....
The inquiry held by Deputy or Charity Commissioner under Section 19 is by no means an administrative or an executive inquiry The rules framed under the Act called the Bombay Public Trusts Rules 1951 ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.