SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 2032

M. S. SONAK
Deputy Collector – Appellant
Versus
Domingos Jose – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.Pinto, Advocate, Priyanka Kamat, Advocate, J.A.Lobo, Advocate, Sampada Poll, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Ms. S. Pinto for the applicants in both these applications. Mr. J.A. Lobo for the respondents in Misc. Civil Application No.20/2021 and Ms. Sampada Poll for the respondents in Misc. Civil Application No.21/2021.

2. Both these Misc. Civil Applications seek condonation of delay of 86 days in instituting the Civil Revision Applications.

3. Ms. S. Pinto points out that after the impugned order dtd. 7/1/2019 was made a review was applied. She points out that there was some issue of certified copy and, thereafter, the matter had to move to various officers to seek opinion and approvals for instituting these revision petitions. She points out that the issues in both these matters concern calculations of compensation and some time was spent for that purpose as well. She submits that there are no malafides involved and sufficient cause has been shown.

4. Mr. Lobo and Ms. Sampada Poll pointed out that the applicants have delayed payment of compensation for the lands which they have acquired. They pointed out that calculations were accepted by the State and based thereon the execution proceedings were also disposed of. They pointed out that an application was made by them to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top