IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S.Gadkari, Milind N.Jadhav, JJ.
Jyoti Jagtap – Appellant
Versus
National Investigating Agency – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 2022
Decided On : 17-10-2022
Appellant, an active member of CPI (Maoist), a banned terrorist organization, was denied bail in connection with the Bhima Koregaon case. The court found that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against her were prima facie true, including her involvement in organizing the Elgar Parishad event, which was used to establish underground contact with CPI (M). The court also noted her association with prominent members of CPI (M) and her role in furthering the objectives of the organization.
Fact of the Case:
Appellant was arrested for her alleged involvement in the Bhima Koregaon case, which involved violence and unrest following the Elgar Parishad event. The prosecution alleged that Appellant was an active member of CPI (Maoist), a banned terrorist organization, and that she had conspired, attempted, advocated, and abated the commission of a terrorist act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against Appellant were prima facie true. The court considered various pieces of evidence, including statements from witnesses, house search panchnamas, and documents seized from Appellant, which indicated her involvement in organizing the Elgar Parishad event and her association with prominent members of CPI (M). The court also noted that the Elgar Parishad event was used to establish underground contact with CPI (M) and that it resulted in large-scale violence and the death of one person.
Issues: Whether there were reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against Appellant were prima facie true.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the material on record, including statements from witnesses, house search panchnamas, and documents seized from Appellant, provided reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against her were prima facie true. The court considered the seriousness of the conspiracy and the threat that it posed, and found that Appellant's involvement in organizing the Elgar Parishad event and her association with prominent members of CPI (M) were sufficient grounds to deny her bail.
Final Decision: The court dismissed Appellant's appeal and upheld the order of the lower court denying her bail.
JUDGMENT
Miliind N. Jadhav,J. - By this Appeal, filed under Sec. 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (for short "NIA Act"), Appellant has challenged the Judgment and Order dtd. 14/2/2022 passed by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay (for short "Trial Court") in NIA Special Case No.414 of 2020, rejecting the Appellant's Bail Application.
2. Appellant is arraigned as accused No. 15 in FIR No. RC-01/2020/NIA/MUM registered by National Investigation Agency (for short "NIA") under Ss. 120B, 115, 121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 505(1)(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC") and Ss. 13,16,18,18A, 20, 38, 39 and 40 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (for short "UAP Act").
3. Facts which emerge for consideration of the present Appeal, are as under:
(i) On 31/12/2017, Bhima Koregaon Shaurya Din Prerana Abhiyan organised an event called 'Elgaar Parishad' in Shaniwarwada, Pune. It was decided to celebrate 200th Anniversary of the historic battle of Bhima Koregaon on 1/1/2018 by more than 200-250 social organisations under the banner of 'Bhima Koregaon Shaurya Din Prerana Abhiyan' led by Hon'ble Justice (Retd.) P.B. Sawant and Hon'ble Justice (Retd.) B.G.Kolse Patil. On 1/1/2018, mobs bearing saffron flags attacked persons travelling to and returning from Shaniwarwada Pune; there was large scale violence and one youth lost his life.
(ii) A Zero(0) FIR was registered on 2/1/2018 at Pimpri Chinchwad Police Station, Pune by eye-witness Ms. Anita Salve under various provisions of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Arms Act,1959, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Previsions of Atrocities) Act, 1989) (for short "SC and ST Act") alleging involvement of Sambhaji Bhide, Milind Ekbote and their followers for the attack and violence. A state wide bandh was also called by several Dalit, OBC, Maratha and Muslim organisations against the attacks across Maharashtra State thereafter.
(iii) On 8/1/2018, first informant Mr. Tushar Damgude, registered FIR No. 4 of 2018 under the provisions of Ss. 153-A, 505(1)(b), 117 read with 34 of IPC stating that, the Elgar Parishad event organised at Shaniwarwada, Pune on 31/12/2017 was attended by him at around 2:00 p.m., wherein there were a few speakers, compere, singers and other performers who performed on stage. The speakers gave provocative speeches, their performances were provocative in nature and had the effect of disrupting columnal harmony. It is stated that the banned terrorist organisation CPI (Maoist) (for short "CPI(M)") had an organisational role to play in the said programme. CPI(M) wanted to infiltrate, inculcate and permeate its ideology amongst the masses, mostly impoverished classes and misguide them towards violent uncontitutional activities. According to complainant Kabir Kala Manch's (for short "KKM") Sudhir Dhawale, other members and activists had performed provocative street plays in different areas of Maharashtra earlier, made malice speeches and spread false history, made disputable statements and objectionable slogans inciting passion and hatred to disrupt communal harmony, sung songs and participated in road dramas. On 31/12/2017, these very activists performed skit / stage plays at the 'Elgar Parsihad' event, as a direct result of which there were incidents of violence, arson, stone pelting and death of an innocent person near Bhima Koregaon, Pune on 1/1/2018.
(iv) Houses of Rona Wilson (Accused No. 2), Surendra Gadling (Accused No. 3), Sudhir Dhawale (Accused No. 1), Harshali Potdar, Sagar Gorakhe (Accused No. 13), Deepak Dhengale, Ramesh Gaichor (Accused No. 14) and Appellant Jyoti Jagtap (Accused No. 15) were searched by the police. Articles and material seized during the search were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory, Pune. The analysis of seized electronics/digital articles confirmed that accused Surendra Gadling, Rona Wilson, Shoma Sen (Accused No. 4), Mahesh Raut (Accused No. 5), Comrade M. @ Milind Teltumbade (WA-1) (
Bhagwan Swarup Lal Bishan Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Lennart Schussler and Anr. Vs. The Director of Enforcement
Amit Sahni (Saheen Bagh) Vs. Commissioner of Police
Union of India Vs. Shiv Shankar Kesari
Sudesh Kedia Vs. Union of India
Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Union of India Vs. Tharmssharasi
Balwant Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Extracts of Kehar Singh and Ors. Vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Bail cannot be granted to active member of a terrorist organisation.
The court granted bail due to insufficient prima facie evidence against the Appellant and prolonged pre-trial detention exceeding three years.
The court established that for bail applications under the UAP Act, the prosecution must provide reasonable grounds for believing the accusations are prima facie true, and that mere membership in a b....
Secs.177 of Cr.P.C., provide as Every offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a Court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed.
Bail – Being a member of banned organization is also an offence under UA(P) Act and bail can be declined.
The court upheld the denial of bail under UAPA, emphasizing the serious nature of the allegations and the prima facie case against the appellant, which posed a threat to national security.
The court established that involvement with a banned terrorist organization and the collection of levies for such groups constitutes serious offenses under the UA(P) Act, warranting denial of bail wh....
The court established that under the UA(P) Act, particularly Section 43D(5), bail can be denied if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusations against the accused are prima facie true, em....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.