IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT GOA
M. S. Sonak, Bharat P. Deshpande, JJ.
Village Panchayat Of Quelossim – Appellant
Versus
State Of Goa & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 155 of 2022
Decided On : 22-09-2022
Appointment - Violation of Rules and Regulations - Goa Panchayat (Staffing Pattern, Scales of Pay and Mode of Recruitment of Staff of Panchayats) Order 2003, Amendment 2007 - The court quashed and set aside the appointment order for the post of 'Peon' due to irregularities in the selection process, including deviation from the prescribed qualifications and excessive reliance on oral interviews. The court directed the government to formulate a transparent procedure for the Selection Committee to avoid arbitrariness in future appointments.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the appointment of a 'Peon' in the Village Panchayat, alleging irregularities in the selection process, including deviation from the prescribed qualifications and excessive reliance on oral interviews. The court observed multiple irregularities in the appointment process and found that the appointment order was issued without the recommendation of the Selection Committee, leading to an illegal appointment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment process for the 'Peon' position was marred by irregularities, including deviation from prescribed qualifications, excessive reliance on oral interviews, and lack of proper recommendation by the Selection Committee. The court also directed the government to formulate a transparent procedure for the Selection Committee to avoid arbitrariness in future appointments.
Issues: The issues revolved around the irregularities in the appointment process, including deviation from prescribed qualifications, excessive reliance on oral interviews, and lack of proper recommendation by the Selection Committee.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the violation of Rules and Regulations, including the Goa Panchayat (Staffing Pattern, Scales of Pay and Mode of Recruitment of Staff of Panchayats) Order 2003 and its Amendment 2007. The court emphasized the need for a transparent procedure for the Selection Committee to avoid arbitrariness in future appointments.
Final Decision: The court quashed and set aside the appointment order for the post of 'Peon' and directed the government to formulate a transparent procedure for the Selection Committee to avoid arbitrariness in future appointments.
JUDGMENT
Bharat P. Deshpande, J. - Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard parties with consent for final disposal.
2. Notices were issued to the respondents on 19/04/2022 and by way of interim order respondent No.6 was restrained from taking charge of the post of 'Peon' till further orders.
3. In a nutshell, the Petitioner contends that respondent No.2 acted in an arbitrary and illegal manner in issuing an appointment letter dated 06/01/2022 in favour of respondent No.6 thereby appointing her to the post of 'Peon' in the office of Village Panchayat Quelossim without there being any recommendation from the Departmental Selection Committee.
4. Heard Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. Manish Salkar, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 5 and Mr. Dharmanad Vernekar, learned Counsel for respondent No.6.
5. Learned Counsel Mr. Costa Frias, appearing for the petitioner/Panchayat, submitted that post of 'Peon' and 'Clerk' had fallen vacant in Village Panchayat Quelossim. Accordingly, the Memorandum dated 02/03/2021 issued by respondent No.5 and in accordance with paragraph 14 of Goa Panchayat (Staffing Pattern, Scales of Pay and Mode of Recruitment of Staff of Panchayats) Order 2003 (hereinafter called as 'Order 2003'), granted no objection to the Block Development Officer/Respondent No.3 herein for the appointment of one Village Panchayat Clerk and one Village Panchayat Peon on regular basis in the office of the Petitioner as per the said order 2003. An advertisement was issued in the newspaper calling eligible candidates, vide dated 02/08/2021, which is at page 31 of the petition.
6. Pursuant to a such advertisement, the Petitioner received 8 applications for the post of 'Peon' and 11 applications for the post of 'Clerk' after scrutinizing all the applications, the same were found valid and eligible for the purpose of an interview. The date of the interview was fixed on 13/12/2021. The members of the Departmental Selection Committee i.e. the Petitioner himself being the Sarpanch of the Village Panchayat, together with respondent No.3 /Block Development Officer and respondent No.4 i.e. the Chief Officer, being a Selection Committee member were intimated. All the candidates were called on 13/12/2021 for the purpose of assessment by the Departmental Selection Committee. The said Committee after a brief discussion prepared individual mark sheets and short listed one candidate for the post of 'Clerk' and one candidate for the post of 'Peon'.
7. It is the contention of the Petitioner that the candidate by name Mr. Clinton D'Silva performed well during the interview and stood first being the resident of Curpavaddo Quelossim, Mormugao Goa and was selected for the post of 'Clerk' based on the recommendation of the Departmental Selection Committee.
8. For the post of 'Peon', Mr. Cavin De Souza, resident of Quelossim, stood third however being a resident of the village Quelossim he was selected on the basis of the recommendation of the Departmental Selection Committee. Ms. Valencia Barbosa/respondent No.6 herein though stood first in the merit list, was not shortlisted being the resident of Zamboll, Cortalim, Mormugao, Goa. Candidate No.2 Mr. Clinton D'Silva who stood second in the list was also not selected as he was already selected for the post of 'Clerk'. The entire exercise was conducted in consultation with Departmental Selection Committee and accordingly an appointment order was issued to Mr. Clinton D'Silva for the post of 'Clerk' by respondent No.2 which is at Annexure H.
9. It is further claimed by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that with respect to the appointment of the post of 'Peon', it was specifically discussed during the meeting that respondent No.6 though stood first, is not resident within the jurisdiction of Village Panchayat and therefore preference has to be given to th
Ashok alias Somanna Gowda and another Vs. State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary and others
Ashok Kumar Yadav and others Vs. State of Haryana and others
Director General, Indian Council for Agricultural Research and others Vs. D. Sundara Raju
Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha and others Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University and others
Praveen Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others
Rekha Chaturvedi (Smt) Vs. University of Rajasthan and others
Vikram Singh and another Vs. Subordinate Services Selection Board, Haryana and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for adherence to Rules and Regulations in the appointment process, including prescribed qualifications and transparent selection procedure....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the selection process must adhere to the terms of the advertisement and the prescribed rules, and any deviation from these norms is impermissi....
The legitimacy of employment selections cannot be challenged solely based on familial relationships unless sinister motives or procedural violations are demonstrated.
It is settled law that a person who consciously takes part in process of selection cannot, thereafter, turn around and question method of selection and its outcome.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.