IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT KOHIMA BENCH
Kakheto Sema, J.
L.Tsukjemwapang S/O Lt. R. Longritemsu –Petitioner
Versus
State Of Nagaland and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/302 of 2017
Decided On : 20-03-2023
Employment and Service matter - Post of Peon - Recruitment - Appointment - Petitioner submits that land on which Court of District & Sessions Judge Court, is located originally belongs to family/clan of petitioner - Land was acquired by State Government without paying any compensation to land owners and as per prevailing practice, petitioner and his clan members have a right to be appointed to Grade-IV post in the said establishment - Submits that there are several Government establishments in located on land which has been occupied in similar manner without paying any land compensation but where Grade-IV appointment has been extended to land owners and to substantiate his submission - Whether petitioner after having consciously participated in interview without any objection and being unsuccessful can now challenge the appointment of the respondent No.3 by questioning constitution of the Screening Committee and selection process – Held, In regard to the claim of petitioner that he has a right to be considered for appointment as peon in office of Principal District & Sessions Judge, on landownership basis, being descendant of Teresangba of Kichu clan who had donated land where office is located, official respondents have contended that one has already been appointed as a Chowkidar by department in establishment of Addl. Public Prosecutor, son landownership basis against retirement vacancy - Employment of landowners, if permitted by a verifiable and valid agreement, is limited to a person first appointed as landowner in government service and does not entitle his descendants for further employment on his retirement from service.” - Intent of Government under Policy to appoint only one eligible landowner to a Grade-IV post irrespective of number of persons as landowners/land donors - Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Imti. Longjem, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. V. Zhimomi, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent No. 1 & 2 and Mr. C. T. Jamir, learned Sr. counsel for the respondent No. 3 assisted by Mr. I. Imchen, learned counsel.
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief;
B. Direct the State respondents to appoint the petitioner to the post of Peon in the Office of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Mokokchung on the basis of landownership in place of the respondent No.3.”
3. The case of the petitioner in a nutshell is that the respondent No. 3 who is not the land owner cannot be appointed as a peon in the Office of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Mokokchung, by depriving the landowner(s). The case in brief is as follows;
ii) That when the matter was thus situated, the petitioner came across the circular dated 04/08/2017 issued by the department of Justice & Law, Kohima, informing that the Departmental Screening Committee will conduct a screening test on 09/08/2017 in the Office Chamber of the Secretary (J&L) for recruitment to Grade-IV post. All committee members were therefore requested to make it convenient to positively attend the meeting. All the applicants were also asked to report at the venue at 10:30 A.M along with their supporting documents. The circular was displayed in the notice board of the department of Justice & Law. Since the petitioner had earlier applied for the post, he appeared before the screening committee.
iii) That by the impugned order No. LAW/JE-42/2012 dated 10/08/2017 issued by the department of Justice & Law, the persons selected for the Grade-IV post was notified. The private respondent was selected for the post of peon in the Office of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Mokokchung. Thereafter, by the impugned order No. LAW/JE-42/2012 dated 11/08/2017, the private respondent was appointed to the said post, by the department, in the Office of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Mokokchung.
iv) The landowners i.e. Kichu clan (descendants of Terasangba) accordingly submitted the application dated 23/08/2017 objecting to the appointment of the private respondent and to issue the appointment in favour of the petitioner.
4. Mr. Imti Longjem, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land on which the Court of the District & Sessions Judge Court, Mokokchung, is located originally belongs to the family/clan of the petitioner. The land was acquired by the State Government without paying any compensation to the land owners and therefore as per the prevailing practice, the petitioner and his clan members have a right to be appointed to the Grade-IV post in the said establishment. Mr. Imti Longjem submits that there are several Government establishments in Mokokchung located on the land which has been occupied in similar manner without paying any land compensation but where the Grade-IV appointment has been extended to the land owners and to substantiate his submission, the learned counsel has taken this Court to the various orders issued by the different departments appointing the land owners to Grade-IV post.
5. The learne
Ashok Kumar & Another versus State of Bihar & Others
Employment benefits derived from land donation are not perpetual or hereditary and are exhausted upon the initial appointment. Furthermore, a candidate who participates in a selection process is esto....
Preference for land donors acts as a tie-breaker for equally qualified candidates, not an absolute right to appointment. Participation in a recruitment process without prior protest precludes candida....
A person who consciously takes part in the process of selection cannot subsequently turn around and question the method of selection and its outcome.
A petitioner must come to court with clean hands and disclose all material facts; failure to do so can result in dismissal of the claim.
Employment benefits based on historical land agreements are governed by current policy and limited in scope, not perpetuity. Additionally, the judiciary is restricted to the pleadings presented and c....
The court established that agreements favoring landowners for government employment do not negate the requirement for a fair and transparent recruitment process, as mandated by constitutional provisi....
A candidate who participates in a selection process cannot later contest the appointment made, especially when not challenging the entire selection process initially.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.