S. V. GANGAPURWALA, S. G. DIGE
Ghai Constitutions – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.V. Gangapurwala, J. - The petitioner is issued with the work order on 08.03.2017 and appointed as contractor for collection of toll at three toll location viz. (i) Toll station near village Lasur on Aurangabad-Lasur Road, State Highway No. 30 (ii) at kilometer 336/800 near Nakshatrawadi on Aurangabad-Paithan Road and (iii) at Sawangi Toll station on Aurangabad-Jalgaon Road at Km 238/700 Maharashtra State Highway No. 8. The offer of petitioner of Rs. 40,14,00,000/- for toll collection at the subjected toll stations for a period of 156 weeks was accepted. The petitioner was required to pay the respondent-Corporation performance security amounting Rs. 4,01,40,000/-. The petitioner submitted bank guarantees of Rs. 1,90,60,000/- and Rs. 2,10,80,000/- totaling to Rs. 4,01,40,000/- valid for 156 weeks.
2. It is case of the petitioner that, since the National Highway Authority had changed the scope of work of Aurangabad-Jalgaon Road, the contractor who had carried excavation on major part of the pre-existing road had left the work midway, thereby reducing the traffic intensity on Aurangabad-Jalgaon Road to 40%, so also by reasons of non-maintenance of 25 km of Lasur Vaijapur Road
Bareilly Development Authority and Another Vs. Ajai Pal Singh and Others
Central Bank of India Vs. Devi Ispat Limited and Others
Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited Vs. State of Kerala and Others
Joshi Technologies International Inc. Vs. Union of India and Others
M/s. Radhakrishna Agarwal and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Others
Limited judicial review in contractual matters, and the requirement for the decision-making authority to consider all relevant material before passing an order.
Parties to a contract must adhere to its terms despite unforeseen circumstances like force majeure, and disputes arising from such a contract should be resolved through contractual mechanisms, not ju....
Point of Law : Commercial Vehicles - Toll plazas/posts/barriers - Collection of Toll Tax – Whether rights of petitioner is violated - Conduct of parties is governed by the Contract Agreement and the ....
The court established that contractual obligations must be fulfilled by both parties, and local issues do not absolve the petitioner from compliance with the contract terms.
Petitioner cannot invoke writ jurisdiction for contractual disputes without public element; claims must be addressed through appropriate legal channels.
Private law disputes arising from contract obligations are resolved through appropriate legal forums and not via writ petitions under public law jurisdiction.
A toll lessee is entitled to a refund of revenue loss sustained due to natural calamities under the terms of Toll Announcements and the Himachal Pradesh Tolls Act, notwithstanding the absence of 'exc....
The court ruled that unilateral extension of a contract post-expiry is arbitrary, emphasizing adherence to contractual terms and the entitlement of the petitioner to operational reimbursements.
Dispute could not be raised by way of a writ petition on disputed questions of fact. Jurisdiction of High Court is wide but in respect of pure contractual matters in field of private law, having no s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that contractual disputes between the State and private parties should be resolved in accordance with the terms of the contract and the laws relati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.