SHAMPA SARKAR
Sasti Pada Nandi – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Shampa Sarkar, J.) :
1. These three writ petitions were heard analogously as the issues involved were connected and the parties were the same.
2. In WPA 10928 of 2020, the writ petitioner prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities, namely, the Bankura Zilla Parishad and its men, agents and subordinates to hand over the toll booth sites for 22 numbers of roads, which were allotted to the petitioner in terms of the agreement and the work order dated December 16, 2019. Further prayer was made for a direction upon the authorities to support the petitioners in setting up the said toll collection booths. Police assistance was also prayed for in order to ensure smooth functioning of the booths, along with a prayer for compensation of Rs.20 lakhs for the harassment caused to the petitioner.
3. W.P.A 6190 of 2022 was filed for a mandamus upon the Bankura Zilla Parishad and its men and agents to alter the roads on which the booths were originally to be set up as per the work order, with a further prayer for support and assistance to operate the booths to be set up in the newly proposed sites as mentioned in the petitioner’s representations dated November 30,
Jay Vee Rice and General Mills vs. State of Haryana and Others
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Kendriya Karamchari Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti
Real Estate Agencies vs. State of Goa and Others
Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) vs. Aafloat Textiles India Private Limited and Others
Joshi Technologies International Inc. vs. Union of India and Others
Har Shankar and Others vs. The Dy. Excise and Taxation Commr. And Others
Kerala State Electricity Board and Anr. vs. Kurien E. Kalathil and Others
Lekhraj Satramdas Lalvani v. Deputy Custodian-cum-Managing Officer
The court established that contractual obligations must be fulfilled by both parties, and local issues do not absolve the petitioner from compliance with the contract terms.
Petitioner cannot invoke writ jurisdiction for contractual disputes without public element; claims must be addressed through appropriate legal channels.
Parties to a contract must adhere to its terms despite unforeseen circumstances like force majeure, and disputes arising from such a contract should be resolved through contractual mechanisms, not ju....
Point of Law : Commercial Vehicles - Toll plazas/posts/barriers - Collection of Toll Tax – Whether rights of petitioner is violated - Conduct of parties is governed by the Contract Agreement and the ....
A public authority cannot cancel a contract arbitrarily without valid reasons, especially when the contract was executed within the authority's term.
Limited judicial review in contractual matters, and the requirement for the decision-making authority to consider all relevant material before passing an order.
The court ruled that unilateral extension of a contract post-expiry is arbitrary, emphasizing adherence to contractual terms and the entitlement of the petitioner to operational reimbursements.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in tender/contractual matters, emphasizing that courts cannot rewrite contracts and that the remedy for contra....
The court emphasizes the necessity of considering exceptional circumstances impacting contractual obligations and mandates competent authority decisions on extension requests.
The power to grant exemption from toll fee lies with the Central Government and not with the court. The location of the Toll Plaza and the manner of toll fee collection for local vehicles had already....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.